Skip to main content

Security report for vinni-vet.eu

Veterinārā klīnika VINNI · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Veterinārā klīnika VINNI is a small veterinary clinic based in Liepāja, Latvia, offering a comprehensive range of veterinary services including consultations, surgeries, laboratory diagnostics, and pet care products. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and detailed service and pricing information, targeting local pet owners. The business maintains an active Facebook presence and provides multiple contact channels including phone, email, and a contact form. Technically, the website uses common web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, and Facebook SDK, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, there is room for improvement in security posture, as no security headers are detected and cookie consent mechanisms are absent, which may impact GDPR compliance. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection by EURid, which is typical for small businesses and does not raise immediate concerns. Overall, the website is functional and trustworthy but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vinni-vet.eu

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The clinic operates in the healthcare sector, specifically veterinary services, serving the local market in Liepāja. Its business model revolves around providing medical and surgical care for pets, along with selling pet food and supplies. The detailed pricing list and staff profiles suggest a transparent and customer-focused approach. The presence of emergency 24/7 services indicates a competitive edge in local veterinary care. The website's integration with local business directories and Google My Business further supports its market presence. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content. The business appears stable but small in scale, with potential growth opportunities through enhanced digital marketing and compliance improvements.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communication, but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are critical for mitigating common web attacks. The absence of a cookie consent banner and privacy compliance indicators suggests potential GDPR compliance gaps. External scripts from Facebook and Google Analytics are used for tracking, which requires proper user consent under privacy laws. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy information are not provided, indicating limited transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to improve protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Deploy a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish clear privacy and security policies on the website, including incident response contacts to build trust and compliance.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure they align with privacy regulations and minimize data exposure.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying relevant certifications or trust badges to strengthen business credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Veterinārā klīnika VINNI
Description
Veterinārā klīnika VINNI Liepājā. Piedāvājam profesionālus veterinārārsta pakalpojumus, izmantojot modernas tehnoloģijas un medikamentus.
Key services
Veterinary consultations, Surgery, Laboratory tests, Ultrasonography, X-ray, Endoscopy, Pet food and supplies, Emergency services 24/7
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, jQuery, Bootstrap, Popper.js, Magnific Popup, jQuery UI, Nice Select, Parallax.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection by EURid.
  3. Website provides detailed veterinary services and pricing.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  5. No privacy or cookie consent banners are active despite references in commented scripts.
  6. Use of multiple external tracking scripts including Google Analytics and Facebook SDK.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in HTML source.
  8. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  9. Content is professional and relevant to veterinary healthcare.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap, and integrates third-party services like Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for analytics and social media features. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear structure with multiple sections including services, pricing, staff, gallery, and contact information. Performance appears moderate with no obvious blocking scripts or errors. However, the absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or static site build, which may limit scalability. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features but maintains basic meta tags and language attributes. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vinni-vet.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vinni-vet.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.