Skip to main content

Security report for vinarstvipodhradem.cz

Vinařství pod Hradem s.r.o. · Hospitality · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vinařství pod Hradem s.r.o. is a small family-owned winery located in the Pálava region of the Czech Republic, specializing in wine production, hospitality services including unique accommodation in wooden barrels and cottages, and online sales of wine and gift vouchers. The company positions itself as a premium local winery offering experiential tourism and wine tasting in the highest wine-growing village in Pálava. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation aimed at wine enthusiasts and tourists. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality, enhanced by popular plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and Revolution Slider. It integrates modern analytics and tracking tools including Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Microsoft Clarity, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. The site is mobile optimized and uses HTTPS, but lacks explicit security headers and documented security policies. Security posture is moderate with no visible critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the absence of security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits domain trust assessment, but the website content and business information appear legitimate and professional. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and well-maintained online presence for a small winery business, with recommendations to enhance security headers, maintain plugin updates, and improve transparency around security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vinarstvipodhradem.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention vinarstvipodhradem.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for vinarstvipodhradem.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality and retail sectors, focusing on wine production and experiential tourism. Its competitive advantage lies in its unique accommodation offerings directly in the vineyard and its location in a prestigious wine region. Revenue streams include accommodation bookings, wine sales via an e-shop, and wine tasting events. The target customers are wine tourists, local and international visitors to the Pálava region, and wine aficionados. The company demonstrates growth potential through digital sales channels and experiential offerings. Partnerships with social media platforms support marketing efforts. Strategic observations include the need to strengthen online security and privacy transparency to build further customer trust.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, which are positive indicators. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which may hinder timely response to security incidents. The use of multiple third-party plugins increases the attack surface and necessitates regular updates and audits. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by cookie and privacy policies, but no dedicated data protection officer contact is found. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires enhancements to meet higher standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Maintain up-to-date WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Conduct regular security audits focusing on third-party plugins and booking system security.
  5. Enhance transparency around data protection by appointing or disclosing a Data Protection Officer or contact.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vinařství pod Hradem s.r.o.
Description
Nabízíme ubytování v dřevěných sudech a stylové chatce přímo ve vinici.
Key services
Accommodation in wooden barrels and stylish cottages, Wine tasting and cellar tours, Online wine and gift voucher sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, WPBakery Page Builder, Revolution Slider, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, FooBox Lightbox, Booking plugin (booking.bm.developer)
Frameworks
WooCommerce, WPBakery
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. No WAF or blocking detected
  3. Uses modern WordPress ecosystem with multiple plugins
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust analysis
  6. Business appears to be a small family winery with hospitality and e-commerce
  7. No explicit security policies or incident response info found
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt present
  9. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram
  10. No exposed emails or phone numbers found in HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a mature WordPress ecosystem with WooCommerce for e-commerce and multiple plugins for enhanced functionality such as booking management, sliders, and lightboxes. The use of Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Microsoft Clarity indicates advanced analytics and user behavior tracking capabilities. The site is mobile optimized and uses modern fonts and responsive design. Performance is moderate, with some potential for optimization in loading times due to multiple scripts and external resources. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vinarstvipodhradem.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vinarstvipodhradem.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.