Skip to main content

Security report for villamagonite.lv

Villa Magonīte · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Villa Magonīte is a small guesthouse located in Ventspils, Latvia, offering family-friendly accommodation with amenities such as free WiFi, free parking, pet-friendly rooms, and shared kitchen facilities. The business targets general tourists and families visiting the Ventspils area, leveraging its proximity to local attractions and the beach. The website is hosted on the Blogger platform, utilizing standard web technologies including jQuery, Font Awesome, and Google Fonts, with a custom template for branding consistency. The site is mobile responsive and provides clear navigation and contact information, including a contact form, phone number, and email address. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or terms of service pages. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust analysis. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy front for a small hospitality business, though improvements in privacy compliance and security practices are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching villamagonite.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
35
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on guest accommodation in a local Latvian market. It offers a range of room types and family-oriented services, positioning itself as a convenient and comfortable option near Ventspils beach and local attractions. The business model is straightforward, relying on direct bookings via contact details provided on the site. The presence of customer testimonials and social media links enhances credibility. The website's use of Blogger suggests a cost-effective digital presence, suitable for a small business. There is no indication of complex partnerships or subsidiaries. The business could benefit from expanding its digital marketing and compliance documentation to strengthen market position and trust.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate risks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. The contact form includes basic client-side validation but no visible advanced protections like CAPTCHA or server-side validation details. No security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited formal security governance. The absence of WHOIS data reduces confidence in domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small hospitality site but requires enhancements to meet higher security standards and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Add a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish terms of service to clarify user and business obligations.
  4. Include a security.txt file and incident response contact information to demonstrate security governance and readiness.
  5. Regularly update third-party libraries and monitor for vulnerabilities to maintain security hygiene.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Villa Magonīte
Description
Naktsmītne Villa Magonīte atrodas Ventspilī, 850 metru attālumā no Ventspils pludmales. Viesu rīcībā ir vairākas ērtības, tostarp grila iekārtas un bezmaksas WiFi. Naktsmītne atrodas netālu no tādām apskates vietām kā bērnu pilsētiņa, piedzīvojuma parks, Piejūras brīvdabas muzejs un Ventspils Augstskola. Viesu namam ir bērnu rotaļu laukums, bezmaksas autostāvvieta, bezmaksas WiFi, mājdzīvnieki ir atļauti pēc pieprasījuma, nesmēķētāju numuri, numuri ģimenēm, terase, dārzs, divas koplietošanas virtuves un koplietošanas telpa ar televizoru.
Key services
Accommodation, Free parking, Free WiFi, Family rooms, Pet-friendly rooms, Shared kitchens, Outdoor terrace and garden
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Blogger platform, jQuery 1.12.4, Font Awesome 4.7.0, Google Fonts (Montserrat, Roboto), Facebook SDK
Platforms
Blogger
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure contact form with client-side validation

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Google Adsense, Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. Content is in Latvian with some German cookie notice.
  3. Site uses Blogger platform with custom template.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  6. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  7. Social media presence limited to Facebook.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No certifications or security frameworks mentioned.
  10. Site is small hospitality business focused on local guest accommodation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Blogger platform, leveraging standard web technologies such as jQuery 1.12.4, Font Awesome 4.7.0, and Google Fonts. It uses a custom template from Sora Templates and includes Facebook SDK for social integration. The site is mobile responsive with a clean layout and clear navigation. Performance is moderate, typical for Blogger-hosted sites. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA attributes. SEO optimization is basic, with proper meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no structured JSON-LD data found. The site lacks advanced analytics or tracking beyond basic Google Adsense and Facebook SDK. Overall, the technical infrastructure is suitable for a small hospitality business but could be modernized for better performance and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with villamagonite.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review villamagonite.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.