Skip to main content

Security report for villa11.lv

Villa 11 · Real Estate · Latvia

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Villa 11 is a real estate project focused on offering modern and historically blended residential apartments in the quiet center of Riga, Latvia. The website presents a professional and well-structured digital presence showcasing 41 apartments with various layouts and features, including a gym and parking facilities. The business targets apartment buyers and investors seeking quality living spaces in a prestigious location. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and integrates Google Maps for location visualization. The site is mobile-optimized and provides multilingual support in Latvian, English, and Russian. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and privacy policies in place, though improvements are recommended in security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits limits full domain trust verification. Overall, the site is credible and professionally maintained, suitable for its real estate business purpose.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching villa11.lv

This scan found 14 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
Average
77
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Villa 11 operates in the real estate sector, focusing on residential property development and sales in Riga. The project combines historical architecture with modern additions, appealing to a niche market valuing heritage and contemporary living. The business model revolves around selling apartments with diverse configurations, including penthouses and duplexes, supported by amenities like a gym and parking. The website's content and structure indicate a small to medium-sized enterprise with a clear target audience of local and regional property buyers. The presence of privacy policies and contact forms suggests compliance with data protection norms. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are disclosed. The company leverages digital marketing through a well-designed website but lacks visible social media or advanced analytics integrations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The presence of a privacy consent checkbox on the contact form indicates awareness of data protection requirements. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness. The site uses up-to-date WordPress and jQuery versions, but continuous monitoring and patching are advised. The lack of explicit cookie consent mechanisms and limited tracking scripts suggest minimal user tracking, aligning with privacy best practices. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be enhanced with recommended improvements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen site security.
  2. Add an explicit cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to improve incident response readiness and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update all CMS components and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding verified contact phone numbers and social media links to improve business credibility and user engagement.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Villa 11
Description
Izsmalcināta un mūsdienīga dzīves telpa pilsētas klusajā centrā – vienā no pirmajām jūgendstila ēkām Rīgā. VILLA 11 sastāv no 41 funkcionāli atšķirīgiem dzīvokļiem, kas piemēroti dažādām gaumēm. Vēsturiskā ēka ir veiksmīgi sapludināta ar modernu piebūvi, kas apvieno tehnoloģijas un funkcionalitāti ar jūgendstilam raksturīgo romantismu. Iedzīvotāju ērtībai ēkas cokolstāvā izvietota sporta zāle, pagalmā autostāvvieta un uzlādes vietas, kā arī noliktavu telpas.
Key services
dzīvokļu pārdošana, dzīvokļu plāni, telpu apdare, sporta zāles pieejamība, autostāvvieta un uzlādes vietas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Maps API, Yoast SEO plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Privacy consent checkbox on contact form

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed real estate project site for Villa 11 in Riga, Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian with English and Russian language options.
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin and Google Maps integration.
  4. Contact form collects name, phone, email with privacy consent checkbox.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present but cookie consent mechanism is not explicit.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  7. No phone number explicitly labeled in footer; only email contact info found.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  9. No social media links detected in provided content.
  10. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond basic plugins.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with jQuery 3.7.1 and uses the Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization. Google Maps API is integrated for location services. The site uses modern CSS and responsive design techniques ensuring good mobile optimization. Performance is moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph tags, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site lacks advanced analytics or tracking tools, indicating a minimalistic approach to user data collection. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small to medium real estate business website but could benefit from enhanced security and analytics capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with villa11.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review villa11.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.