Skip to main content

Security report for vigogroup.eu

Vigo · Healthcare · Belgium

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vigo is a healthcare-focused company specializing in orthopedic aids such as prostheses, orthoses, wheelchairs, bicycles, scooters, insoles, and orthopedic shoes, primarily serving the Belgian market. The website is professionally designed, targeting Dutch and French speaking audiences, and provides a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism reflecting GDPR compliance efforts. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, and reCAPTCHA for bot protection. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and cookie consent but lacks visible advanced security headers or published security policies. The absence of WHOIS registrant data is consistent with EURid's privacy policies for .eu domains, and the domain appears legitimate based on website content and tracking disclosures. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence for its healthcare business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vigogroup.eu

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Vigo operates in the healthcare sector, focusing on orthopedic medical devices and mobility aids. Its business model is retail and service-oriented, catering to individuals requiring orthopedic solutions in Belgium. The company leverages partnerships with major platforms like Google, LinkedIn, Spotify, and YouTube for marketing and analytics. The website's multilingual support (Dutch and French) aligns with its regional target market. While no direct contact details beyond an external email for the web agency are found, the site maintains good branding consistency and content relevance. The lack of explicit privacy and terms pages suggests room for improvement in transparency. No suspicious domains or partners were identified, indicating a focused and specialized business ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and a detailed cookie consent mechanism that categorizes cookies by necessity, preferences, statistics, and marketing. The inclusion of reCAPTCHA scripts indicates bot mitigation efforts. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security maturity. No security policy or incident response contacts are published, which is a gap in security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from publishing a security.txt file and enhancing header configurations to improve defense-in-depth.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage.
  3. Add a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vigo
Description
Bij Vigo vind je een uitgebreid aanbod orthopedische hulpmiddelen zoals prothesen, orthesen, rolstoelen, fietsen, scooters, steunzolen en orthopedische schoenen
Key services
Prothesen, Orthesen, Rolstoelen, Fietsen, Scooters, Steunzolen, Orthopedische schoenen
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Google Fonts, Typekit Fonts, reCAPTCHA
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URLs)
  • Cookie consent banner with granular consent options
  • reCAPTCHA script included

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, LinkedIn, Spotify, YouTube
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories and vendor disclosures.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service page found in the provided content.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Use of multiple third-party tracking and marketing services including Google, LinkedIn, Spotify, and YouTube.
  6. WHOIS data is not available publicly, consistent with EURid policies for .eu domains.
  7. Website targets Dutch and French speaking audiences in Belgium.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie management, Google Fonts, Typekit fonts, and reCAPTCHA for bot protection. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. The site uses multiple external domains for analytics, marketing, and embedded content (Spotify, YouTube). Technical debt appears low but could be improved by adding structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced SEO and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vigogroup.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vigogroup.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.