Skip to main content

Security report for vigancakes.lv

Vigan Cakes · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vigan Cakes is a small Latvian business specializing in vegan cakes with a focus on natural, gluten-free, and refined sugar-free ingredients. The company offers a variety of seasonal vegan cakes and related products, including gift cards, with local delivery and pickup options primarily serving the Riga area. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, providing an e-commerce platform for ordering. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies such as lazy loading, Google Fonts, and optimization plugins, ensuring a good user experience and mobile responsiveness. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though security headers could be enhanced. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration insights, but the website's professional presentation and contact transparency support its legitimacy. Overall, the site is well-structured, user-friendly, and compliant with privacy regulations, making it a trustworthy platform for customers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vigancakes.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail sector, targeting consumers interested in vegan and health-conscious food products. Its competitive advantage lies in offering specialized vegan cakes with natural ingredients and seasonal variety. Revenue streams include direct online sales, local delivery, and gift card sales. The company maintains active social media channels on Facebook and Instagram, enhancing customer engagement and brand visibility. The business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce combined with local physical pickup, suitable for a small enterprise. Growth indicators include recent product additions and seasonal offerings. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating an independent operation. The partnership ecosystem is limited but includes payment processing and analytics services. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding delivery areas and enhancing security measures to support growth.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, ensuring encrypted communications. Cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a potential risk vector. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are missing, which could hinder rapid mitigation of security incidents. The site would benefit from implementing a security.txt file and publishing clear incident response contacts. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small e-commerce site but could be improved to reduce risk and enhance customer trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file with incident response contact information to improve vulnerability disclosure and incident handling.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance monitoring and logging to detect and respond to security incidents promptly.
  5. Consider deploying a Web Application Firewall (WAF) to protect against common web attacks and improve overall security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vigan Cakes
Description
Vigan Cakes offers a variety of vegan cakes with changing seasonal flavors.
Key services
Vegan cakes sales, Local delivery, Gift cards
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Google Fonts, Typekit Fonts, Autoptimize plugin, LazySizes (lazy loading images), jQuery UI Datepicker
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack Stats, WooCommerce Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats (stats.wp.com), WooCommerce Analytics
Marketing tools
WooCommerce, Jetpack
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich with product offerings, detailed descriptions, and ordering information.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  5. No security.txt or incident response information found.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  7. Website uses WordPress and WooCommerce with common plugins for optimization and analytics.
  8. No critical security issues detected; security headers could be improved.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and Waze links included.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It uses modern front-end technologies including jQuery, lazy loading for images, Google Fonts, and Typekit for typography. Performance is moderate with optimization plugins like Autoptimize in use. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and accessible navigation. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph tags, and JSON-LD structured data for enhanced search engine visibility. However, there is no evidence of advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential plugin vulnerabilities if not regularly updated. Overall, the technical infrastructure is sufficient for a small retail e-commerce site but could be enhanced for scalability and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vigancakes.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vigancakes.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.