Skip to main content

Security report for viesunamsjurmala.lv

Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website viesunamsjurmala.lv represents a small hospitality business located in Jūrmala, Latvia, offering guest house accommodations, event venues for weddings and corporate events, camping facilities, boat trips, and related leisure services. The site targets a general audience interested in hospitality and recreational activities in the Jūrmala region. The business model focuses on providing venue rental and accommodation services with additional amenities such as saunas, fishing, and water sports. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and several plugins including Contact Form 7, NextGEN Gallery, Monarch social sharing, and a cookie consent plugin. The site enforces HTTPS via JavaScript redirect and includes a cookie consent banner with detailed categories, although no cookies are currently displayed. The site shows moderate performance and good mobile optimization but lacks some modern security headers and uses an outdated jQuery version. From a security perspective, the site has a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented. However, it lacks explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, no security headers are detected, and no contact information is found in the HTML content. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust analysis. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the site content is safe with no adult or explicit material. Overall, the site is functional and moderately secure but would benefit from improved privacy compliance, enhanced security headers, updated libraries, and clearer contact information to increase trustworthiness and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching viesunamsjurmala.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on local clientele and visitors to Jūrmala, Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in offering a variety of services including guest house accommodations, event spaces, camping, and water-based activities, catering to both leisure and corporate customers. The multilingual website supports Latvian, Russian, English, German, and Lithuanian, indicating a strategy to attract a diverse audience. Revenue streams likely include accommodation fees, event venue rentals, and ancillary services such as boat trips and sauna usage. The presence of social media links suggests active engagement with customers. The lack of explicit business registration or certification information limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism in place, supporting GDPR compliance to some extent. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found, indicating compliance gaps. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small hospitality site but requires improvements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against web attacks.
  3. Update jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Include clear contact information such as company emails and phone numbers on the website to improve business credibility.
  5. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website represents a hospitality business offering guest house accommodations, event spaces for celebrations and corporate events, banquet halls, camping, boat trips, and related leisure activities in Jūrmala, Latvia.
Key services
Guest house accommodations, Wedding venue, Camping, Boat trips and marina services, Banquet and seminar halls, Picnic areas, Trailer and camper parking, Sauna services, Fishing and water sports
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.2.21, Divi Theme 3.0.27, jQuery 1.12.4, NextGEN Gallery plugin, Contact Form 7 plugin, Monarch plugin, Cookie Law Info plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
PHP (implied by WordPress), Apache or similar (implied)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced via script redirect
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack WordPress Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
WordPress.com Stats (Jetpack)
Marketing tools
Monarch social sharing plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based hospitality site with multilingual support.
  2. Cookie consent banner is implemented with detailed categories but no cookies are currently displayed.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the main HTML content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
  5. Social media presence includes Facebook, Twitter, and Google+ links.
  6. HTTPS is enforced via JavaScript redirect.
  7. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Divi theme and several popular plugins for galleries, forms, social sharing, and cookie consent. The technology stack is standard for small to medium hospitality websites. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with proper meta tags but could be enhanced. The site enforces HTTPS via JavaScript redirect but lacks server-side security headers. The use of older jQuery versions indicates some technical debt. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with viesunamsjurmala.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review viesunamsjurmala.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.