Skip to main content

Security report for videsizpete.lv

SIA Vides izpēte · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Vides izpēte is a Latvian company specializing in certified land surveying and geodesy services, including topographic surveying, cadastral land surveying, land management, engineering geodesy, and 3D laser scanning. The company targets clients across Latvia, providing professional surveying solutions primarily for real estate and land management purposes. The website is built on the Mozello CMS platform and hosted via Amazon Cloudfront CDN, incorporating modern web technologies such as jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking and marketing purposes. The site is mobile-optimized and provides clear navigation, though content depth is basic. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent banner, indicating some level of privacy compliance. However, it lacks visible security headers, a privacy policy, terms of service, and contact emails, which are important for trust and regulatory compliance. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the content is safe and professional. Overall, the website presents a functional and moderately secure digital presence for a small Latvian surveying business but would benefit from enhanced privacy disclosures, security headers, and more comprehensive contact information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching videsizpete.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate services sector with a focus on land surveying and geodesy. Its business model is service-oriented, targeting clients needing certified surveying across Latvia. The website indicates a small-sized company with a local/regional market position. The use of Mozello CMS and Amazon Cloudfront suggests a cost-effective hosting and content management approach. The presence on Instagram indicates some social media engagement. The lack of detailed business registration data and privacy policies suggests room for maturity in corporate transparency and compliance. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is present, limiting incident response readiness. The absence of company contact emails reduces transparency for security communications. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Engaga introduces tracking but no obvious vulnerabilities were detected. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident response.
  4. Provide clear company contact emails, including security and support contacts, to improve communication and trust.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks and ensure privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Vides izpēte
Description
SIA Vides izpēte is a certified surveyors team operating throughout Latvia offering services such as topographic surveying, cadastral land surveying, land management, engineering geodesy, and 3D laser scanning.
Key services
Topographic surveying, Cadastral land surveying, Land management, Engineering geodesy, 3D laser scanning
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Mozello platform scripts
Platforms
Mozello CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Engaga
Marketing tools
Engaga
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent banner implemented in Latvian language.
  5. Contact phone number clearly displayed with Latvian country code.
  6. No company contact email found in the HTML content.
  7. Social media presence limited to Instagram.
  8. Website uses Mozello CMS and Amazon Cloudfront CDN.
  9. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager used for tracking.
  10. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Mozello CMS and uses jQuery 2.2.4 along with Fancybox 3 for UI components. Hosting is via Amazon Cloudfront CDN, which supports good performance and availability. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for marketing and analytics tracking. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as skip links. However, the site lacks advanced SEO metadata such as Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data, limiting rich search engine presentation. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of scripts. The technical stack is modern enough for a small business but could benefit from enhanced SEO and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with videsizpete.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review videsizpete.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.