Skip to main content

Security report for vfn.cz

Všeobecná fakultní nemocnice v Praze · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Všeobecná fakultní nemocnice v Praze is a leading university hospital in Prague, Czech Republic, providing comprehensive healthcare services including clinical care, pharmacy, blood donation, and patient education. The website targets patients, healthcare professionals, media, and job seekers, reflecting a public healthcare institution model. The site is professionally designed with consistent branding and trust indicators such as accreditation certificates and official contact information. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS using the UIkit framework and integrates common web technologies like jQuery and Google Analytics. It demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, although some security headers are not detected in the provided data. The site uses HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a basic level of privacy compliance. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully assess domain legitimacy and registration consistency. The website does not show signs of adult or malicious content and maintains a moderate level of user tracking via analytics tools. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence for a major healthcare institution, though improvements in security headers and transparency of domain registration could enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of vfn.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vfn.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The hospital holds a strong market position as a major healthcare provider in Prague, serving a broad audience including patients and medical professionals. Its business model is public healthcare with services spanning clinical treatment, pharmacy, blood donation, and educational initiatives. The website supports recruitment efforts and media relations, indicating active engagement with stakeholders. The presence of social media links and accreditation certificates supports credibility and outreach. Revenue streams likely derive from public funding and healthcare services. The hospital's digital ecosystem includes partnerships with pharmacy and blood donation services, though no explicit partner domains were identified. Growth indicators include ongoing events and campaigns featured on the site.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting awareness of privacy and security requirements. However, no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The lack of a public security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. The use of third-party analytics introduces moderate tracking but appears compliant with GDPR through consent banners. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for enhancement in headers and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by providing explicit data retention policies and user rights information.
  5. Investigate and resolve the absence of WHOIS data to improve domain registration transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Všeobecná fakultní nemocnice v Praze
Registration number
IČO: 00064165
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Všeobecná fakultní nemocnice v Praze
Description
General University Hospital in Prague providing healthcare services including clinics, pharmacy, blood donation, and patient education.
Key services
Clinical care, Pharmacy services, Blood donation, Patient education, Career opportunities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, UIkit, WordPress, Google Analytics, TranslatePress
Frameworks
UIkit
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed healthcare institution site.
  2. Content is in Czech with English alternate available.
  3. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to privacy or domain status.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with UIkit framework.
  5. Includes cookie consent and privacy policy.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  7. Social media presence on major platforms.
  8. No signs of adult or malicious content.
  9. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely supported technology stack centered on WordPress CMS with UIkit for UI components and jQuery for scripting. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for user tracking and analytics. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. The site uses SVG icons and JSON animations for interactive elements, indicating a focus on user experience. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation is lacking, representing a potential risk area.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 67/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vfn.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vfn.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.