Skip to main content

Security report for vermittlerregister.info

Finance · Germany

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Email security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.vermittlerregister.info serves as the official German registry for insurance intermediaries, financial investment intermediaries, fee-based financial advisors, and real estate loan intermediaries. It provides a centralized platform for professionals in these sectors to register and verify their credentials, positioning itself as a key authoritative source within the German financial services industry. The site targets industry professionals and regulatory bodies, emphasizing transparency and compliance within the financial intermediary market. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including Angular and Material Design components, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly interface. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism via Klaro indicates attention to privacy compliance, although explicit privacy and terms of service documents were not detected in the provided content. Performance and accessibility are rated as good, with mobile optimization well addressed. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies or incident response contacts. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for such official domains, and does not raise immediate concerns. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected in the content or technical setup. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing additional security headers and publishing clear privacy and security policies. The overall risk assessment is low, with the site appearing legitimate and professionally maintained. Strategic recommendations include enhancing transparency with published privacy and terms policies, improving security headers, and providing clear contact information for security incidents to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vermittlerregister.info

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention vermittlerregister.info, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for vermittlerregister.info.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as an essential entity within the German financial services sector, specifically focusing on the registration and regulation of insurance and financial intermediaries. Its market position is authoritative, serving as the official registry, which provides a competitive advantage through regulatory backing. The business model is service-oriented, facilitating compliance and verification for intermediaries. Revenue streams are likely government or regulatory funded, with no commercial advertising detected. The target customer segments include insurance brokers, financial advisors, and regulatory authorities. Growth indicators are stable given the regulatory nature. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, but the domain registrar and cookie consent provider are notable service partners. Strategic observations suggest a focus on compliance, transparency, and digital modernization through Angular-based infrastructure.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The lack of explicit privacy policies and incident response contacts indicates gaps in compliance and readiness. Data protection practices are partially implemented via cookie consent but lack comprehensive documentation. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing contact channels. The security culture appears to be in early to mid stages of maturity, with room for improvement in transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish detailed privacy policy and terms of service documents to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including a dedicated security or abuse email address.
  4. Introduce a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  5. Regularly audit and update technical infrastructure to maintain modern standards and address potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Startseite der offiziellen Website des deutschen Registers für Versicherungsvermittler und -berater, Finanzanlagenvermittler, Honorarfinanzanlagenberater und Immobiliardarlehensvermittler.
Key services
Registering insurance intermediaries, Registering financial investment intermediaries, Registering fee-based financial advisors, Registering real estate loan intermediaries
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular, Material Design Components, Klaro Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is official German registry for insurance and financial intermediaries.
  2. Content is in German language and targeted at professionals in finance and insurance sectors.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content provided.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Klaro.
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly detected in the provided content.
  6. WHOIS data is privacy protected and incomplete.
  7. No social media links or external marketing/advertising detected.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  9. Website uses Angular framework and Material Design components.
  10. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL status unknown but URL is HTTPS.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern Angular framework with Material Design components, indicating a contemporary and maintainable front-end architecture. The use of Klaro for cookie consent shows attention to privacy compliance mechanisms. Performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. However, the absence of detected CMS or hosting provider details limits full infrastructure assessment. The site lacks visible security headers, which is a technical debt and a risk factor. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and language settings. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vermittlerregister.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vermittlerregister.info.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.