Skip to main content

Security report for ventspilspoliklinika.lv

Pašvaldības SIA “Ventspils poliklīnika” · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pašvaldības SIA “Ventspils poliklīnika” operates as a regional primary healthcare provider in Ventspils, Latvia, offering a broad range of medical services including specialist consultations, laboratory services, vaccinations, and health check-ups. The website targets local patients and residents, providing clear information about services, specialists, and contact details. The organization maintains a professional online presence with social media channels and a privacy policy aligned with GDPR requirements. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Swiper.js, ensuring mobile responsiveness and a user-friendly experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though additional security headers and explicit incident response policies are absent. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ventspilspoliklinika.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ventspilspoliklinika.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ventspilspoliklinika.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The clinic holds an essential role in the healthcare sector within its region, focusing on primary care and specialist medical services. Its business model is public service-oriented, likely funded or managed by local government entities. The website reflects a medium-sized organization with a clear service portfolio and patient engagement through online appointment booking and feedback mechanisms. The presence of social media and structured service information suggests a moderate digital maturity. No advertising or affiliate marketing is present, indicating a focus on service delivery rather than commercial monetization. The lack of WHOIS data restricts deeper insights into ownership and domain history, but the consistent branding and contact information support legitimacy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is found, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability reporting. No signs of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the frontend. The site lacks explicit incident response contact channels, which is a gap for security incident management. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and establish a clear vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact information or security-related email addresses to improve readiness.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Pašvaldības SIA “Ventspils poliklīnika”
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pašvaldības SIA “Ventspils poliklīnika”
Description
Pašvaldības SIA “Ventspils poliklīnika” sniedz visu veidu primārās veselības aprūpes pakalpojumus un speciālistu konsultācijas, organizē ārstu komisijas, kā arī izsniedz visu veidu izziņas par veselības stāvokli.
Key services
Ārstniecība, Konsultācijas, Laboratorija, Vakcinācija, Pieņemšanas laiki, Pakalpojumu cenrādis, Konferenču zāles noma
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, jQuery Cookie plugin, Swiper.js (slider), Bootstrap (modal, collapse), Google Fonts (Montserrat)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Clear presence of privacy policy and cookie consent banner indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. Contact information is prominently displayed with official email and phone number.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and YouTube supports legitimacy.
  6. No security.txt or explicit security policies found.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  8. Website uses modern frontend libraries and is mobile responsive.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is healthcare focused.
  10. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap, and Swiper.js for UI components and interactivity, indicating a moderately modern frontend stack. Google Fonts integration ensures consistent typography. The site is mobile responsive with a clear navigation structure and search functionality. No major performance bottlenecks or errors were observed in the HTML content. The CMS appears custom or proprietary, as no common CMS signatures were detected. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. The site lacks advanced analytics or tracking scripts, which may reflect a privacy-conscious approach or limited marketing focus. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ventspilspoliklinika.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ventspilspoliklinika.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.