Skip to main content

Security report for vent.at

Hospitality · Austria

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.oetztal.com/de/regionen-orte/vent serves as a regional tourism portal focused on the Vent village in the Ötztal valley, Austria. It provides visitors with information about alpine hiking, skiing, and local attractions. The site targets tourists and outdoor enthusiasts seeking authentic mountain experiences. The business model centers on tourism promotion and regional marketing, positioning itself as a trusted source for travel planning in the region. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as GSAP, Swiper, Leaflet, and Rive for interactive and visual content. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and a professional design, although accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or security policies in the provided content. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of WHOIS data reduces the trust score, but the website content and technical setup indicate a legitimate and professional operation. Overall, the website presents a solid tourism information platform with room for improvement in privacy transparency, security headers, and incident response readiness. Strategic enhancements in these areas would strengthen user trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vent.at

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates within the hospitality sector, specifically regional tourism promotion for the Ötztal valley. It leverages partnerships with local businesses and service providers, as evidenced by multiple linked partner domains. The business model likely relies on destination marketing and possibly affiliate or referral arrangements with local accommodations and activity providers. The target audience includes alpine tourists interested in hiking and skiing. The site demonstrates consistent branding and good content quality, supporting its market position as a regional tourism authority. Growth opportunities may include expanding digital marketing tools and enhancing direct booking capabilities.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and a detailed cookie consent banner that complies with GDPR principles. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a security.txt file or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security best practices. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The site should improve transparency by publishing privacy and security policies and implementing additional HTTP security headers. Regular audits of third-party scripts and enhanced incident response readiness would further mitigate risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service documents linked from the homepage.
  3. Create and maintain a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and incident reporting.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for data protection officer or security incident response team.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking technologies to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Entdecke Vent am Talschluss des Ötztals. Das Bergsteigerdorf Vent ist beliebt für hochalpine Bergtouren und ursprüngliche Skierlebnisse.
Key services
Tourism information, Regional promotion, Event and activity details
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, GSAP, Swiper, Leaflet, Rive
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating possible privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories and vendor disclosures.
  4. No explicit contact information or privacy policy links found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Multiple external domains related to tourism partners and service providers are linked.
  6. Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot are used for analytics and consent management.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  8. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. Website content is focused on tourism in the Ötztal region, specifically Vent village.
  10. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end with libraries such as GSAP for animations, Swiper for sliders, Leaflet for maps, and Rive for interactive graphics. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics deployment, and Cookiebot manages cookie consent. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for SEO with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. No CMS was explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and engaging user experience but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vent.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vent.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.