Skip to main content

Security report for vema.media

VEMA Versicherungsmakler Genossenschaft eG · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VEMAmedia is a specialized video production service brand under the VEMA Versicherungsmakler Genossenschaft eG, based in Karlsruhe, Germany. The company offers a range of video services including livestreams, recruiting videos, image films, and social media videos, supported by two professional studios. Their target audience primarily consists of businesses seeking to enhance their employer branding and recruitment efforts through high-quality video content. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good mobile optimization, reflecting a solid digital presence for a small media production business. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Carousel, with standard CSS and HTML5, but lacks visible advanced frameworks or CMS identification. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied, and forms include CSRF tokens, but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but no visible cookie consent mechanism. WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for small businesses, and no suspicious patterns were found. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but could improve security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vema.media

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention vema.media, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for vema.media right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the media sector with a niche focus on video production for corporate clients, particularly in recruitment and employer branding. Their business model is service-oriented, leveraging professional studio facilities and expertise to deliver tailored video content. The parent company, VEMA Versicherungsmakler Genossenschaft eG, is referenced prominently, indicating a cooperative structure. The website's social media integration and clear contact channels support customer engagement and brand visibility. There is no evidence of large-scale advertising or tracking, suggesting a focus on direct client relationships rather than broad marketing campaigns. The lack of detailed WHOIS data is consistent with privacy protection norms for small businesses. The company appears well-positioned within its niche but could benefit from enhanced digital marketing and security practices.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS usage is confirmed by URLs, and the contact form includes CSRF tokens, indicating awareness of basic web security practices. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. There is no evidence of an incident response policy or security certifications. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent banner or detailed GDPR compliance indicators. The WHOIS privacy protection is justified for this business type. Recommendations include implementing security headers, enhancing privacy transparency, and conducting regular security audits to improve resilience and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Conduct a security audit of third-party libraries and update them regularly to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Develop and publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact information to improve trust and preparedness.
  5. Enhance analytics and marketing tools with privacy-compliant solutions to better understand user engagement and improve business insights.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
VEMA Versicherungsmakler Genossenschaft eG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VEMA Versicherungsmakler Genossenschaft eG
Description
VEMAmedia offers professional video production services including livestreams, recruiting videos, image films, explainer videos, animations, event videos, product videos, and social media videos. They operate two professional film studios and focus on creating tailored films to help companies present themselves as attractive employers.
Key services
Livestreams, Recruiting Videos, Image Films, Explainer Videos, Animations, Event Videos, Product Videos, Social Media Videos
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.4.1, Slick Carousel, Font Awesome, CSS3, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical and og:url https)
  • Contact form with CSRF token

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and focused on video production services.
  3. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection.
  4. Contact information is clear and includes phone, email, physical address, and contact form.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected, though privacy policy page exists.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data; security posture could be improved.
  7. Social media presence is strong with multiple platforms linked.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a straightforward technology stack with jQuery 3.4.1, Slick Carousel for sliders, and Font Awesome for icons. The CSS is modular and includes responsive design elements, supporting good mobile optimization. No CMS or advanced frameworks were detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight platform. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of scripts and onload CSS media switching to optimize rendering. The site structure is clear with semantic HTML5 elements and proper meta tags for SEO and social media sharing. However, the absence of visible security headers and limited privacy mechanisms indicate areas for technical improvement. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vema.media. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vema.media.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.