Skip to main content

Security report for velographs.com

Vélographs · Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vélographs is a specialized e-commerce business offering personalized cycling map artwork that visualizes the range of a sixty-minute bike ride from any location. The company targets cycling enthusiasts and art lovers, providing a unique product that blends cartography and art. Their market position is niche but well-defined, with a focus on quality prints, framing options, and free shipping. Technically, the website is built on Webflow with integrations for analytics and marketing, including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Reddit Pixel, and FoxyCart for payment processing. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile devices, with a professional design and clear navigation. Security posture is good with HTTPS and bot protection via Cloudflare Turnstile, but lacks some security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces trust but the overall professional presentation and active e-commerce functionality support legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include improving privacy compliance with cookie consent, publishing security policies, and adding security headers to enhance protection and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching velographs.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Vélographs operates in the retail and transportation sectors, focusing on personalized cycling map art. Their business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce with a strong emphasis on customization and sustainability. The company leverages affiliate marketing and partners with FoxyCart for payment processing. Their target customers are cycling enthusiasts and gift buyers who value unique, high-quality artwork. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a high level of trustworthiness. Growth potential exists through expanding design options and geographic coverage. The partnership with vercorslabs for website development indicates a professional approach to digital presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Cloudflare Turnstile captcha to mitigate automated abuse. Tracking pixels are used responsibly, but the absence of a visible cookie consent banner and lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policies are not publicly documented, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional compliance and policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response page to demonstrate preparedness and transparency.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Consider appointing and publishing Data Protection Officer contact information to enhance GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vélographs
Description
Vélographs creates custom cycling map artwork that visualizes the range of a sixty minute bike ride from any given location. Customers can select a starting location, choose from multiple design styles, and order personalized, gallery-quality prints including framed and canvas options.
Key services
Custom cycling map generation, Personalized artwork printing, Framing and mounting options, Free shipping
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Reddit Pixel, FoxyCart, Monto.io, Cloudflare Turnstile Captcha, jQuery, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare Turnstile captcha for bot protection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form handling with anti-bot measures

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Reddit Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Reddit Pixel
Marketing tools
Monto.io
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Professional e-commerce site specializing in personalized cycling map artwork.
  2. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to domain privacy or recent registration.
  3. Uses modern web technologies and multiple tracking pixels for analytics and marketing.
  4. No explicit cookie consent banner found despite use of tracking technologies.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact primarily via forms and affiliate login.
  6. Strong branding and consistent design throughout the site.
  7. Free shipping and sustainability emphasized as trust signals.
  8. Affiliate program and third-party payment processor (FoxyCart) integrated.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Fonts, and multiple analytics and marketing integrations. Performance is optimized with responsive images and asynchronous script loading. The use of FoxyCart indicates a secure and scalable e-commerce payment solution. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features. Technical risks are minimal, but the absence of certain security headers and explicit privacy controls represent areas for modernization. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly online shopping experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with velographs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review velographs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.