Skip to main content

Security report for vecrungi.lv

SIA Vecruņģi · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vecruņģi is a Latvian property management company specializing in administration, technical maintenance, cleaning, and client services through an online portal. The company targets residential property owners and residents, providing essential property upkeep and administrative support. The website is built on the Mozello CMS platform and uses Amazon Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, indicating a moderate level of technical infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and offers a clear user experience with accessible contact methods including a 24/7 emergency phone number and a contact form. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and privacy policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, but the domain appears privacy protected, which is typical for small businesses. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vecrungi.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate sector focusing on property management services in Latvia. Its business model revolves around providing comprehensive property administration, technical support, and cleaning services to residential clients. The presence of a dedicated client e-system portal suggests a digital approach to customer service and billing. The company maintains a Facebook presence, indicating engagement with customers via social media. The lack of detailed business registration data and privacy policies on the website suggests room for improvement in transparency and compliance. The partnership with klientiem-vecrungi.lv for client services indicates an integrated service ecosystem. The company appears to be a small-sized local business with a consistent brand presentation and a focus on practical property management solutions.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS as indicated by canonical URLs but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The contact form includes client-side validation but no CAPTCHA or advanced bot protection, which could expose it to spam or abuse. No published security policies or incident response contacts were found, limiting transparency on how security incidents are handled. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap under GDPR. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from implementing standard web security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance site security.
  3. Introduce CAPTCHA or other anti-bot measures on web forms to prevent spam and abuse.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party libraries and CMS components to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Vecruņģi
Description
Vecruņģi provides property management and administration services including full-service administration, client e-system for invoice payments and meter readings, technical assistance for engineering networks and equipment maintenance, and cleaning services for residential properties.
Key services
Administration, Client e-system, Technical assistance, Cleaning
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox3, Bannerplay, ResponsiveVideos, MozLive
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS implied by canonical link with https
  • Form validation with basic client-side checks

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information includes a phone number clearly labeled as emergency contact and a contact form with email and phone fields.
  5. No security policies or incident response contacts are published.
  6. Site uses Mozello CMS and Amazon Cloudfront CDN for hosting and delivery.
  7. No analytics or tracking services detected.
  8. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  9. Content is focused on property management services in Latvia.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected; site is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Mozello CMS and leverages Amazon Cloudfront CDN for hosting and content delivery, which supports moderate performance and scalability. The front-end uses jQuery 2.2.4 along with Fancybox3 and other JavaScript libraries for UI components. The site is mobile responsive with basic accessibility features but lacks advanced SEO optimizations and security headers. The absence of analytics tools suggests limited user tracking and data collection. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could be modernized with updated libraries, enhanced security configurations, and improved SEO and accessibility standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vecrungi.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vecrungi.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.