Skip to main content

Security report for vecernik.wiki

Zprávy IN · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Večerník is a Czech language online magazine focusing on journalism, art, and culture, operated under the entity 'Zprávy IN'. The website offers inspirational reading and exclusive photography, targeting a general audience interested in cultural and journalistic content. The business is relatively new, with domain registration in 2023, and operates as a small media publisher in the Czech Republic. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and the Penci Soledad theme, leveraging Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking. Hosting is provided by WEDOS Internet, a reputable Czech registrar and hosting provider. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks some recommended security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is accessible, well-structured, and professionally presented but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vecernik.wiki

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a niche cultural and journalistic media outlet in the Czech market, leveraging digital publishing to deliver curated content. Its business model appears to be content-driven, likely monetized via advertising and partnerships, as indicated by banner ads and external links. The presence of social media links and Google Analytics suggests active audience engagement and data-driven marketing. The site uses modern CMS and design frameworks, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. No direct contact information or detailed business credentials are publicly available, which is common for small media publishers. The domain registration is consistent with the business profile, and no suspicious patterns are detected. The site could improve transparency and trust by adding privacy, cookie, and terms of service pages.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are important to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. External links are configured to open in new windows with noopener to prevent tab-nabbing attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML source. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not present, which limits transparency in security management. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved with standard best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve security transparency.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zprávy IN
Description
Večerník wiki je magazín, který Vám přináší to nejlepší ze světa žurnalistiky, umění a kultury. Nabízí inspirativní čtení a exkluzivní fotografie.
Key services
journalism, art and culture magazine content, inspirational reading, exclusive photography
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, PHP, Elementor 3.32.5, All in One SEO plugin, Penci Soledad theme, Google Fonts, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No DNSSEC enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • External links open in new windows with noopener

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Czech language media magazine focused on journalism, art, and culture.
  2. Content is well structured with recent articles and categories.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with Elementor and Penci Soledad theme.
  5. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking.
  6. No security headers explicitly found in HTML source.
  7. External links open in new windows with noopener for security.
  8. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on homepage.
  9. Social media links to Facebook and Twitter present.
  10. Domain registration is recent but consistent with site content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and the Penci Soledad theme, indicating a contemporary and flexible technical infrastructure. It integrates Google Fonts and Google Analytics for typography and analytics respectively. The site is hosted by WEDOS Internet, a Czech hosting provider, which aligns with the domain registration country. Performance is moderate with some lazy loading of images and preconnect/dns-prefetch optimizations. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements and mobile menus. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by All in One SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. The site uses jQuery and other standard JavaScript libraries. No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were detected, but security enhancements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vecernik.wiki. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vecernik.wiki.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.