Skip to main content

Security report for vanoord.com

Van Oord · Energy · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Van Oord is a well-established global marine contractor specializing in marine infrastructure, offshore wind, coastal protection, and land reclamation with over 155 years of experience. The company emphasizes sustainability and safety through dedicated programs and aims to support the energy transition and climate adaptation. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern technologies such as React, Google Analytics, and Tag Manager, and provides comprehensive content and navigation for its target audience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security headers and incident response information are lacking. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which should be further investigated. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized, but could improve transparency in security and contact information.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of vanoord.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vanoord.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
98
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention vanoord.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
275
Employees
49
Customers
56
Third parties
170
Weak passwords
7%

Latest record dated 2026-05-29 · 15 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for vanoord.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –registration.vanoord.com2026-05-29
  • –sts.vanoord.com2026-05-28
  • –vo-payslip.vanoord.com2026-05-28
  • –sts.vanoord.com2026-05-27
  • –sts.vanoord.com2026-05-26

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Van Oord operates in the energy and transportation sectors, focusing on marine contracting and offshore infrastructure. Its business model is project-based, delivering engineering and construction services globally. The company leverages its Dutch heritage and extensive experience to maintain a strong market position. The website indicates a large enterprise with a broad portfolio of services and a commitment to sustainability and safety. The digital ecosystem includes social media engagement and annual reporting, supporting transparency and stakeholder communication. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified from the website content. The company targets clients requiring marine infrastructure and renewable energy solutions, positioning itself as an innovative and sustainable partner.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a baseline security posture. However, no explicit security headers (such as CSP, HSTS) were detected in the provided data. There is no visible security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are important for mature security governance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. The use of security tokens in forms suggests some protection against CSRF attacks. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing security policies, adding security headers, and providing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Provide explicit security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Add clear company contact emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  5. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration information to improve trust and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Van Oord
Description
Van Oord is a global marine contractor with over 155 years of experience delivering marine ingenuity. They focus on creating space for a growing population, maritime infrastructure, coastal protection, offshore wind, offshore infrastructure, and Dutch infrastructure solutions. They emphasize sustainability, safety, and innovation.
Key services
Land reclamation, Maritime infrastructure, Coastal protection, Offshore wind, Offshore infrastructure, Dutch infrastructure
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Forms, React (inferred from react-content div), WebP images, Modern CSS
Frameworks
React
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security tokens in forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
HubSpot Forms
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong emphasis on sustainability and safety programs.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  4. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  5. No explicit terms of service page detected.
  6. Social media presence is strong with official company accounts.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools.
  8. WHOIS data missing, which reduces trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including React for frontend rendering, Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, and HubSpot for forms. Images are optimized using WebP format and the site is mobile responsive with good accessibility features. The CMS appears to be a custom solution developed by Vidda Digital BV. Performance is fast with preloading of fonts and images. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. There is no indication of legacy or vulnerable libraries. Technical risks are minimal but domain registration inconsistencies could pose reputational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 77/100Low26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vanoord.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vanoord.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.