Skip to main content

Security report for vanadzini.lv

Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vonadziņi.lv is a Latvian hospitality website representing a recreation complex offering accommodation and leisure services. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and several marketing and analytics integrations such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. The site supports multiple languages including Latvian, English, and Russian, indicating a target audience that includes local and international visitors. The technical infrastructure is modern and includes standard web technologies and plugins for bookings and multilingual content. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site appears professional and functional but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vanadzini.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
48
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on leisure and accommodation services in Latvia. The multilingual approach suggests an intent to attract a diverse customer base. The use of WooCommerce Bookings indicates a direct-to-consumer business model with online reservations. Marketing tools and tracking pixels show active digital marketing efforts. Lack of visible contact information and privacy policies may impact customer trust. No evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries was found. The company size appears small based on website scope and content. The market position is likely local or regional within Latvia's hospitality industry.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected in the provided content. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure. The site uses several third-party scripts which may increase attack surface if not properly maintained. No obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with better headers, policies, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and reduce risk.
  4. Publish a security.txt file and incident response policy to provide transparency and facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  5. Improve accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Vonadziņi is an atpūtas komplekss (recreation complex) presumably offering leisure and accommodation services.
Key services
Accommodation, Recreation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.1.1, WooCommerce 3.5.4, jQuery 1.12.4, jQuery UI 1.11.4, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, MonsterInsights, SitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML), WooCommerce Bookings, DuracellTomi Google Tag Manager plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based hospitality site for a recreation complex in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian with multilingual support (English, Russian).
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service pages detected in the analyzed content.
  5. Multiple tracking and marketing scripts are used including Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics.
  6. No security.txt or explicit security/incident response information found.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain registration details unknown.
  8. Website uses HTTPS and appears to have a moderate security posture.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.1.1 with WooCommerce 3.5.4 and uses multiple plugins including WooCommerce Bookings and WPML for multilingual support. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and jQuery CDN. Performance is moderate with some inline scripts and styles for above-the-fold content. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design detected. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and hreflang attributes. However, the WordPress version is outdated, which may pose security risks. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small hospitality business website but requires updates and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vanadzini.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vanadzini.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.