Skip to main content

Security report for urporn.com

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UrPorn.com is an adult content aggregator website that provides categorized lists and links to a wide range of free and premium pornographic sites, including niche categories such as Asian porn, incest, deepfake, fetish, and more. The site operates primarily as a directory and referral platform, targeting adult users seeking easy access to diverse adult content. The business model relies on affiliate linking rather than hosting content directly. Technically, the website uses Bootstrap for styling and Cloudflare for DNS services, with HTTPS enabled ensuring secure connections. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which could improve its security posture. Privacy compliance is minimal, with a basic privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR indicators. Contact information is limited to a contact page without explicit emails or phone numbers, reducing business credibility. Overall, the site is functional but basic in design and security, with room for improvement in privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching urporn.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention urporn.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
12
Employees
0
Customers
12
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
17%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for urporn.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website holds a niche position as an adult content directory, aggregating links to numerous external porn sites across various categories. Its long domain age (since 2004) suggests established presence in the adult media space. The business model is affiliate/referral based, monetizing traffic by directing users to partner adult platforms. The target audience is adult consumers seeking free and categorized porn content. The site does not display direct monetization methods such as ads or affiliate disclosures visibly, which may limit transparency. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies. The lack of direct contact details and limited privacy compliance may impact user trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS and domain transfer/update protections, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No incident response or security policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and minimal privacy compliance indicate potential regulatory risks. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, DNSSEC, and privacy compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan with dedicated contact channels.
  5. Provide clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides curated lists and links to various adult content sites including free porn tube sites, leaked OnlyFans content, TikTok porn, live sex cams, Asian porn, incest porn, amateur porn, deepfake porn, fetish porn, vintage porn, hentai streaming and porn sites, celebrity porn, Indian porn, shemale porn, and porn search engines.
Key services
Curated lists of adult content websites, Links to free and premium porn sites, Categorized adult content discovery
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap CSS, Cloudflare DNS, Custom JavaScript
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content aggregator linking to numerous external pornographic sites.
  2. No direct hosting or content delivery of adult videos; purely a directory.
  3. No visible privacy or cookie consent banners despite privacy policy presence.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided; only a contact page link.
  5. No security or incident response policies published.
  6. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected in HTML content.
  7. No advertising or affiliate disclosures visible.
  8. Website uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC and security headers.
  9. Content is accessible without WAF or security challenges.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a straightforward technical stack with Bootstrap CSS and custom JavaScript for UI interactions. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare DNS services, improving DNS reliability and performance. The site is mobile responsive and moderately optimized for performance. However, the absence of CMS identification suggests a custom or minimal CMS solution. SEO is basic with meta description and title tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal. There is no evidence of third-party analytics or tracking scripts, which may limit marketing insights but improves privacy. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but basic, with opportunities for modernization and enhanced security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with urporn.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review urporn.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.