Skip to main content

Security report for urnash.com

Egypt Urnash · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Egypt Urnash is an independent artist and webcomic creator whose website serves as a portfolio and sales platform for comics, illustrations, and related merchandise. The site targets fans of speculative fiction, queer comics, and illustration enthusiasts, leveraging crowdfunding platforms like Patreon and Comradery for support. The business model is primarily content-driven with direct sales of printed books, PDFs, and merchandise. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Jetpack and Patreon Connect, providing a moderate level of digital maturity with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which impacts compliance and trust. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices to enhance trustworthiness and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching urnash.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Egypt Urnash as a niche independent creator in the media industry, focusing on queer and speculative fiction webcomics and illustration. The business leverages multiple revenue streams including direct sales and crowdfunding, targeting a mature audience interested in NSFW and furry content. The presence of testimonials from notable authors adds credibility. The external ecosystem includes merchandise platforms and social media channels, supporting community engagement and monetization. Growth potential is tied to content quality and audience engagement rather than scale. The lack of formal business registration data and WHOIS information limits external verification but is typical for personal artist sites.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and no sensitive data leaks are evident in the HTML. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and no explicit GDPR indicators. The site uses common WordPress plugins which require regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is sufficient for a personal site but lacks enterprise-grade controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible links on the site footer or header.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a security policy and vulnerability disclosure statement, including a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to reduce risk of exploitation.
  5. Consider adding contact emails for security and incident response to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Egypt Urnash
Description
A personal website showcasing comics, illustrations, and related creative works by the artist known as Egypt Urnash. The site features various webcomics, illustration portfolios, and commerce links for printed books, PDFs, and merchandise.
Key services
Webcomics, Illustration portfolio, Printed book sales, Digital PDF sales, Merchandise sales, Crowdfunding support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.5.5, jQuery 3.7.1, Jetpack plugin, Patreon Connect plugin, MediaElement.js
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce for AJAX calls (jetpack-carousel nonce)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats (stats.wp.com), WordPress.com pixel
Marketing tools
Patreon Connect plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal artist portfolio and webcomic site.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found on the site.
  3. Contact is available via a contact page but no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  4. Site uses WordPress with common plugins like Jetpack and Patreon Connect.
  5. No security headers detected in the HTML source.
  6. HTTPS is enabled and used throughout.
  7. Contains adult content warnings and NSFW material.
  8. No WHOIS data available for the subdomain; domain registration info missing.
  9. External links mostly to social media, crowdfunding, and merchandise platforms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS version 6.5.5 with jQuery 3.7.1 and Jetpack plugin integration. It uses Patreon Connect for crowdfunding integration and MediaElement.js for media playback. The site loads CSS and JS assets efficiently and includes responsive design elements for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but present. The site lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy compliance mechanisms. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is typical for a personal creative portfolio site with room for security and compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with urnash.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review urnash.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.