Skip to main content

Security report for up.coop

UP COOP · Finance · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UP COOP operates the website up.coop, providing payment solutions focused on enhancing the well-being of employees and citizens through targeted purchasing power products such as meal vouchers, cultural and service checks, and social aid solutions. The company is positioned as a leader in France's multi-enseigne gift and payment solutions market, targeting SMEs, HR professionals, commercial directors, and employee committees. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and uses WordPress CMS with modern marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Piano Analytics, and Didomi for consent management. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced, clientTransferProhibited domain status, and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published. The domain registration data is consistent with the business identity and country, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence with good privacy compliance and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching up.coop

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

UP COOP's market positioning as a provider of employee benefit payment solutions is supported by a comprehensive product portfolio and a clear target audience. The business model revolves around enabling companies and public entities to offer targeted purchasing power benefits to their employees and citizens. The presence of Trustpilot integration and consent management indicates a focus on trust and compliance. The company appears to be medium-sized, founded in 2014, and operating primarily in France. The website content and structure support lead generation and customer engagement through contact forms and quote requests. The use of advanced analytics and A/B testing tools suggests ongoing optimization efforts.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses security best practices such as clientTransferProhibited domain status and cookie consent via Didomi. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No security.txt or explicit security policy pages were found, and no incident response contact channels are published, which are areas for improvement. The use of multiple third-party scripts (Trustpilot, Kameleoon, Didomi) requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional transparency and DNS security measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a security policy page and security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Maintain and enhance privacy compliance by updating cookie and data processing disclosures as regulations evolve.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UP COOP
Description
Donnez du pouvoir d’achat ciblé avec nos solutions : déjeuner, cadhoc, Chèque Culture, Chèque Lire, Chèque de Services, Chèque Domicile à utiliser partout.
Key services
Solution déjeuner, Solution cadhoc, UpOne, Chèque Domicile, Chèque Culture, Chèque Lire, Chèque de Services, Cohésia
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Cloudflare DNS, Google Tag Manager, Trustpilot widget, Didomi Consent Management, Kameleoon A/B testing
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piano Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piano Analytics, Didomi Consent SDK
Marketing tools
Trustpilot widget, Kameleoon A/B testing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Strong GDPR and cookie consent compliance with Didomi integration
  3. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools
  4. Clear business focus on payment solutions for employee benefits
  5. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security vulnerabilities detected
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistent business identity
  7. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact likely via forms
  8. No explicit terms of service page detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin for search optimization. It uses Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services, enhancing performance and security. The presence of Google Tag Manager, Piano Analytics, Didomi consent management, and Kameleoon A/B testing scripts indicates a modern and data-driven technical infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple third-party scripts. No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve DNS security and formalize security policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with up.coop. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review up.coop.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.