Skip to main content

Security report for uniworld.com

Uniworld · Hospitality · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Uniworld is a luxury river cruise company offering curated travel experiences across Europe, India, Vietnam, Cambodia, Peru, and Egypt. The website positions itself as the world's most renowned river cruise line, targeting travelers seeking intimate cultural and historical experiences. The business model focuses on high-end hospitality services with a global reach. Technically, the website employs modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. However, there is no visible privacy policy or terms of service in the provided content, which is a compliance gap. Security posture is moderate with cookie consent implemented but lacking visible security headers or detailed security policies. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which slightly reduces trust but is common for commercial entities. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uniworld.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention uniworld.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
151
Employees
0
Customers
141
Third parties
10
Weak passwords
25%

7 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for uniworld.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Uniworld operates in the hospitality sector specializing in luxury river cruises. Its market position as a leading cruise line is supported by extensive global offerings and a focus on cultural immersion. The company leverages multiple third-party services for marketing, customer feedback (Feefo), and analytics, indicating a robust partnership ecosystem. The absence of explicit contact details and corporate registration information online suggests a potential area for improvement in customer trust and regulatory compliance. The business targets affluent travelers and likely generates revenue through direct bookings and partnerships. Growth indicators include the use of advanced marketing tools and a broad geographic footprint.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. It uses HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, which are positive indicators. However, there is no evidence of advanced security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS in the provided data. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, and no security contact channels are identified. The lack of visible privacy and terms of service pages may expose the company to compliance risks, especially under GDPR and other privacy regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content analyzed. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a commercial website but requires enhancements in transparency and technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement and verify security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including security and incident response contacts.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and cookies to ensure compliance with privacy regulations.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Uniworld
Description
From the rivers of Europe to exotic India, Vietnam, Cambodia, Peru & Egypt, Uniworld provides an intimate view of some of the world's oldest civilizations and their enduring treasures.
Key services
River cruises in Europe, River cruises in India, Vietnam, Cambodia, Peru, Egypt, Luxury travel experiences
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Feefo widget, HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Quantcast, Neustar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Adroll Group, Appnexus
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Feefo, Quantcast, Neustar
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Feefo, LiveChat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional luxury river cruise operator
  2. Uses multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and active
  4. No visible privacy policy or terms of service links found in the provided HTML
  5. No explicit contact information (email, phone, address) found in the provided content
  6. WHOIS data is not available, indicating privacy protection or domain registration issues
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, Cookiebot for cookie consent management, and Feefo for customer reviews. The site loads multiple asynchronous scripts from trusted domains, indicating a well-structured front-end. Fonts and assets are preloaded for performance optimization. Mobile optimization appears good based on viewport meta tags and responsive CSS. Accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in SEO optimization and accessibility compliance. The absence of visible security headers and privacy documentation suggests technical debt in security and compliance areas.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uniworld.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uniworld.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.