Skip to main content

Security report for uniweb.eu

UniWeb · Healthcare · Belgium

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UniWeb is a Belgium-based company specializing in building and supporting performant web applications tailored for the healthcare, pharmaceutical, and business sectors. Their market position is that of a specialized digital consulting and software development provider with a strong focus on regulatory compliance and healthcare-specific solutions. Key services include clinical trials data management, health apps and medical devices, business administration and analytics, digital marketing, and managed IT services. The company demonstrates professionalism through certifications such as ISO 9001 and ISO 27001, and a portfolio of notable clients and case studies. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Hotjar, CookieHub for cookie consent management, and SEO optimization plugins. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and structured content. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility compliance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though security headers and explicit security policies are absent. The security evaluation reveals good privacy compliance with a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism and GDPR-aligned practices. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are gaps that should be addressed. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is reasonable for this business type, and no suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, UniWeb presents a credible and professional digital presence with a solid foundation in security and privacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and improving accessibility standards to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uniweb.eu

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
55
Email security
67
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

UniWeb operates in a niche market serving healthcare and life sciences organizations requiring digital transformation and regulatory compliant software solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in domain expertise, regulatory knowledge, and a comprehensive service offering from clinical data management to managed IT services. Revenue streams likely include consulting fees, software development contracts, hosting and maintenance services, and digital marketing. Target customers are healthcare providers, pharmaceutical companies, certification bodies, and business organizations in related sectors. Growth indicators include EU-funded projects and partnerships with universities and healthcare institutions. The partnership ecosystem includes specialized projects like CoroPrevention and Eforto, enhancing their market credibility and innovation capacity.

Security posture

UniWeb demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide and use of privacy-respecting analytics tools. The cookie consent banner provides granular control, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published, which limits transparency and readiness perception. Absence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files suggests room for improvement in security communication. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the site content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet recognized standards (e.g., WCAG 2.1).
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
UniWeb BV
VAT number
BE0472383367
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UniWeb
Description
We build and support performant web applications that fit the needs for Health, Pharma & Business
Key services
Clinical Trials & Data Management, Health Apps & Medical Devices, Business administration & Analytics, Digital Marketing & Communication, Managed IT services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Hotjar, CookieHub, Sprout SEO plugin, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Sprout SEO plugin
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure analytics and tracking scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar, CookieHub
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection or query failure
  3. Strong focus on healthcare and life sciences digital solutions
  4. Good use of structured data and SEO best practices
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed categories
  6. Certifications ISO 9001 and ISO 27001 are prominently displayed
  7. Contact information is clearly provided with verified company phone and email
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts found
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected
  10. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools with privacy controls
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for UI components, and analytics tools like Google Analytics and Hotjar for user behavior tracking. CookieHub is used for cookie consent management, indicating attention to privacy compliance. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) extensively for SEO and rich snippets, improving search engine visibility. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and responsive design for mobile devices. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in accessibility and security headers would enhance robustness and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uniweb.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uniweb.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.