Skip to main content

Security report for unipolsai.it

Unipol Assicurazioni · Finance · Italy

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Unipol Assicurazioni is a leading Italian insurance company specializing in multi-branch insurance products, particularly in the non-life insurance sector. The website serves as a digital platform for customers to obtain insurance quotes and access company information. The company holds a strong market position in Italy and targets a broad audience seeking insurance services. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, with integrations of analytics and tracking tools like Adobe Alloy, Google Tag Manager, and Dynatrace RUM. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices but lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts privacy compliance scores. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no obvious vulnerabilities, but the absence of explicit security headers and incident response information suggests room for improvement. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, though enhancing transparency around privacy and security policies would strengthen user trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching unipolsai.it

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention unipolsai.it, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
50,458
Employees
17
Customers
50,037
Third parties
404
Weak passwords
5%

Latest record dated 2026-05-20 · 80 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for unipolsai.it.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –www.unipolsai.it2026-05-20
  • –unipolsai.it2026-05-15
  • –www.unipolsai.it2026-04-21
  • –www.unipolsai.it2026-02-22
  • –unipolsai.it2025-12-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Unipol Assicurazioni operates in the finance sector as a major insurance provider in Italy. Its business model revolves around offering a wide range of insurance products to individuals and businesses, leveraging online channels for customer engagement and quote generation. The company benefits from a strong brand presence and consistent digital branding. While the website does not explicitly disclose revenue streams or detailed partnership information, the use of advanced analytics and tracking indicates a focus on customer insights and marketing optimization. The absence of visible contact details and compliance documentation suggests potential areas for operational transparency enhancement. The company likely maintains a large customer base given its market leadership and size classification.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs modern JavaScript libraries, contributing to a solid security foundation. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits the organization's transparency and readiness to handle security incidents. Enhancing these areas would improve compliance with GDPR and other regulatory frameworks, as well as bolster user confidence in the platform's security.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate potential security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Unipol Assicurazioni
Description
Unipol Assicurazioni è la Compagnia assicurativa multiramo leader in Italia nei rami danni. Fai subito un preventivo!
Key services
Insurance products, Online insurance quotes
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Adobe Alloy, Google Tag Manager, Dynatrace RUM
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of modern JavaScript libraries
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Dynatrace RUM, Google Tag Manager, Adobe Alloy
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe Alloy, Dynatrace RUM
Marketing tools
Medallia
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and uses modern web technologies.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found in the HTML content.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. Multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts are used.
  5. No security or incident response policies are publicly visible.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files detected.
  7. Content is in Italian and targets Italian insurance customers.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; site content is accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern technology stack including Next.js and React, enabling server-side rendering and efficient client-side interactivity. Integration with Adobe Alloy, Google Tag Manager, and Dynatrace RUM indicates a mature approach to user analytics and performance monitoring. The site appears to be mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and good SEO metadata. However, the lack of visible CMS identification and hosting provider details limits full infrastructure assessment. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of scripts and use of modern JavaScript bundles. Accessibility features are basic, suggesting opportunities for improvement to meet higher standards. Overall, the technical implementation supports a robust and scalable digital presence but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with unipolsai.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review unipolsai.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.