Skip to main content

Security report for uniklinikumgraz.at

Steiermärkische Krankenanstaltengesellschaft m.b.H. · Healthcare · Austria

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

87/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Universitätsklinikum Graz is a large, well-established university hospital in Austria, affiliated with the Medical University of Graz and the Steiermärkische Krankenanstaltengesellschaft m.b.H. It provides comprehensive patient care, medical education, and research services. The website reflects a professional healthcare institution with a strong regional presence and a large workforce. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS, uses Matomo for analytics, and complies with GDPR through a comprehensive privacy and cookie policy. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no critical vulnerabilities detected. Overall, the site is trustworthy, well-branded, and user-friendly, targeting patients, medical partners, and students.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uniklinikumgraz.at

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
87

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The hospital operates in the healthcare sector as a public university hospital, serving a broad audience including patients, relatives, medical professionals, and students. It benefits from partnerships with regional healthcare groups and the medical university, enhancing its research and educational capabilities. The business model focuses on healthcare delivery, education, and research, positioning it as a key regional healthcare provider and employer. The website supports this with clear navigation, relevant content, and active social media engagement, indicating a mature digital presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, there is no explicit security policy or incident response contact information published, which could be improved. The use of Matomo analytics respects privacy better than many alternatives. Security headers were not explicitly detected, suggesting room for enhancement. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from formalizing security policies and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Steiermärkische Krankenanstaltengesellschaft m.b.H.
Description
Krankenhaus mit Fokus auf Patientenversorgung, Universitätsklinikum verbunden mit Medizinischer Universität Graz, innovativ in Ausbildung und Forschung, großer Arbeitgeber in Steiermark.
Key services
Patient care, Medical education, Research, Emergency services, Specialized clinics and facilities
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Google Maps embed, Matomo Analytics, DataReporter cookie consent, YouTube embedded videos
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo/Piwik
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Matomo/Piwik
Marketing tools
DataReporter cookie consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie regulations.
  3. Use of modern CMS (TYPO3) and analytics (Matomo) indicates digital maturity.
  4. No critical security issues detected in the content or scripts.
  5. Social media presence is active and consistent with brand.
  6. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious behavior.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used content management system, indicating a stable technical foundation. Embedded Google Maps and YouTube videos enhance user experience but require user consent due to data privacy. Matomo analytics is used for privacy-conscious tracking. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, likely due to rich media content. There is no indication of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly healthcare website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uniklinikumgraz.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uniklinikumgraz.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.