Skip to main content

Security report for ultrarecords.com

Sony Music Entertainment · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ultra Records is a music label brand prominently associated with Sony Music Entertainment, focusing on new music releases and artist promotion primarily in the electronic and dance music genres. The website serves as a promotional platform linking to official social media and streaming services, targeting music fans and listeners globally. The business model revolves around music publishing, digital distribution, and artist branding under a major entertainment conglomerate. Technically, the website employs modern front-end libraries such as jQuery, Slick Carousel, AOS for animations, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and provides a visually appealing user experience, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. The absence of detected CMS or hosting details limits deeper infrastructure insights. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms despite using tracking scripts, which may pose compliance risks. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual and reduces trustworthiness despite the strong brand association with Sony Music. No forms or direct contact information are provided, limiting user engagement and support transparency. Overall, the website is functional and professionally branded but would benefit from enhanced security practices, improved privacy compliance, and clearer contact channels to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ultrarecords.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ultra Records operates as a subsidiary or brand under Sony Music Entertainment, a global leader in the music industry. The label focuses on electronic and dance music genres, leveraging digital platforms like Spotify, Apple Music, and social media for distribution and promotion. The business model is centered on music publishing and artist development, targeting a global audience of music consumers. The partnership ecosystem includes major streaming services and social media platforms, enhancing market reach. The lack of direct contact information and WHOIS transparency suggests a controlled corporate web presence rather than a standalone entity. Growth indicators include active social media engagement and frequent new releases. Competitive advantages stem from Sony Music's global infrastructure and brand recognition.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS implied but not explicitly confirmed in the data. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates potential vulnerabilities to common web attacks. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces tracking but lacks a cookie consent mechanism, raising privacy compliance concerns under GDPR. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, limiting transparency. The missing WHOIS data is a notable anomaly that could indicate privacy protection or registry issues but reduces domain trust. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing standard security headers, explicit privacy controls, and public security policies to enhance its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations given the use of tracking scripts.
  3. Publish clear security and incident response policies to improve transparency and user trust.
  4. Verify and correct WHOIS domain registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and improve trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimizations to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sony Music Entertainment
Description
Ultra Records is a music label brand associated with Sony Music Entertainment, focusing on new music releases and artist promotion.
Key services
music publishing, artist promotion, digital music distribution
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Slick Carousel, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Typekit Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a music label promotional site with strong branding linked to Sony Music Entertainment.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces trust score.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the site.
  4. Privacy and terms policies are linked to Sony Music's main site, indicating corporate governance.
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of tracking scripts.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  7. No forms or data collection fields found on the main page.
  8. Social media presence is strong with official accounts linked.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack including jQuery, Slick Carousel for sliders, AOS for scroll animations, and Typekit for fonts. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site loads external CSS and JS from reputable CDNs, indicating a reliance on third-party services for performance and functionality. The HTML structure is valid with meta tags for viewport and Open Graph, though some OG tags like URL and image are empty, which could be improved for social sharing. No CMS or backend platform is detected. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good but accessibility features are basic. No explicit hosting provider or SSL configuration details are available from the data provided.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ultrarecords.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ultrarecords.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.