Skip to main content

Security report for ultraexpress.lv

SIA Ultra Express · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Ultra Express operates a specialized ultrasonography (USG) center located in Riga, Latvia, providing diagnostic ultrasound services for adults, pregnant women, children, and infants. With over 10 years of experience, the company positions itself as a trusted local healthcare provider offering both state-funded and paid services. The website reflects a professional healthcare business with clear service offerings, partnerships with national health and insurance entities, and a focus on quality diagnostics. Technically, the site is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies such as Google Fonts and Google Maps API, and includes a cookie consent mechanism indicating GDPR awareness. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, though some security headers are missing and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Overall, the website is well-designed, accessible, and trustworthy, supporting the company’s business credibility in the healthcare sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ultraexpress.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets patients in Riga and nearby regions seeking ultrasonography diagnostics, including specialized groups such as pregnant women and children. Its business model combines state-funded and private paid services, supported by collaborations with the National Health Service and multiple insurance companies, which strengthens its market position. The website content and partner logos reinforce trust and reliability. The company appears to be a small-sized healthcare provider with a focused service portfolio. The partnership with Ultra Fitness sports club suggests a broader health and wellness ecosystem. No direct revenue or financial data is available, but the presence of discounted complex USG packages indicates competitive pricing strategies. The company’s digital presence is professionally maintained, supporting patient engagement through online appointment forms and clear contact channels.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and a cookie consent banner, demonstrating baseline security and privacy compliance. However, the absence of visible HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No security.txt or incident response contact information is published, which limits transparency for vulnerability reporting. The contact form uses required fields but lacks visible anti-bot or CAPTCHA protections. No third-party analytics or tracking scripts beyond cookie consent are detected, minimizing privacy risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for a small healthcare provider, but improvements in security headers and incident response readiness are recommended to enhance protection and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen site security.
  2. Publish a security policy and security.txt file to provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure channels.
  3. Add CAPTCHA or anti-bot measures on contact forms to prevent spam and abuse.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Ultra Express
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Ultra Express
Description
Ultrasonogrāfijas (USG) centrs in Riga specializing in ultrasonographic examinations and diagnostics for adults, pregnant women, children, and infants with over 10 years of experience.
Key services
Ultrasonography (USG) examinations, Complex USG diagnostic packages, Services for adults, pregnant women, children, infants
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Fonts (Noto Sans, Noto Serif), jQuery 3.5.1, Google Maps API, CookieConsent v3.1.0
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical and external resources)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form with required fields

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. Contact information is comprehensive and clearly presented.
  5. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  6. Website uses modern Webflow CMS and Google Fonts with good technical implementation.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond cookie consent.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; content is healthcare focused.
  9. Business partnerships with national health and insurance companies enhance trust.
  10. Security headers not detected in provided data; recommend adding for improved security posture.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern web fonts (Noto Sans and Noto Serif) and Google Maps API for location display. It loads jQuery 3.5.1 and a cookie consent library from CDNJS. Hosting is via Webflow’s CDN infrastructure, ensuring reliable delivery. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Performance is moderate, with video backgrounds and image sliders that may impact load times but enhance user engagement. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA roles and labels present but could be improved. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies are evident. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional healthcare website with room for optimization in performance and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ultraexpress.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ultraexpress.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.