Skip to main content

Security report for ultradonkey.com

Ultra Donkey Porn Links · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ultra Donkey Porn Links operates as an adult content aggregator website providing free pornographic images and video links. The site primarily functions through affiliate marketing by linking to numerous external adult content providers and cam sites. Its market position is niche within the adult entertainment sector, targeting adult users seeking free pornographic content. The website's business model relies on advertising and affiliate commissions rather than direct content hosting or subscription services. Technically, the site is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS platforms, resulting in moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is minimal; while HTTPS is enabled, the absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates a low maturity level in security and privacy compliance. The lack of WHOIS registration data and absence of contact or company information further reduce trustworthiness. Overall, the site presents significant risks related to legitimacy, privacy compliance, and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ultradonkey.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website's business intelligence reveals a small-scale operation focused on aggregating and linking adult content rather than producing original content. Its competitive advantage lies in the breadth of free pornographic links and categories offered. Revenue streams are primarily from affiliate marketing and advertising. The target customer segment is adult users seeking free pornographic material. There is no evidence of formal partnerships beyond affiliate links, and no parent or subsidiary companies are identified. Growth indicators and strategic positioning are unclear due to lack of transparency and business information. The partnership ecosystem is limited to adult content networks and cam sites. Operationally, the site lacks professional business disclosures, which may hinder trust and long-term sustainability.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak. HTTPS is implemented, which is a basic requirement, but no additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options are present. There is no visible privacy or cookie policy, nor any GDPR compliance indicators. The site lacks incident response contacts or security policies. Forms are minimal and do not appear to have enhanced security measures. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant information raises concerns about domain legitimacy and potential abuse. Overall, the site is vulnerable to common web security risks and does not demonstrate adherence to security best practices or compliance frameworks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear contact information and business disclosures to improve trust and credibility.
  4. Conduct a WHOIS domain registration audit to ensure domain legitimacy and update registrant information if necessary.
  5. Enhance form security and consider deploying a Web Application Firewall (WAF) to mitigate automated abuse and attacks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ultra Donkey Porn Links
Description
Ultra Donkey provides thousands of free sex pictures and free porn movies, featuring the best free XXX porn links distributed in several sex-related categories.
Key services
Free pornographic image galleries, Free pornographic video links, Affiliate links to adult cam sites and porn networks
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content aggregator with extensive external linking to pornographic sites.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact information or company details provided.
  4. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled but minimal security best practices observed.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, raising legitimacy concerns.
  6. Site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with no modern frameworks or CMS detected.
  7. Advertising and affiliate marketing are primary revenue sources.
  8. No social media or official company presence linked.
  9. Site content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is constructed using basic web technologies (HTML, CSS, JavaScript) without modern frameworks or CMS platforms. It lacks advanced technical features such as structured data (JSON-LD), Open Graph tags, or accessibility enhancements. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness. SEO optimization is minimal, relying mainly on meta tags for description and keywords. The site does not use analytics or tracking services visibly. Technical debt is evident in the absence of security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. Modernization opportunities include adopting a CMS for better content management, implementing structured data for SEO, and improving accessibility and mobile optimization. Technical risks include potential security vulnerabilities due to missing headers and lack of incident response readiness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ultradonkey.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ultradonkey.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.