Skip to main content

Security report for ukrsibbank.com

UKRSIBBANK BNP Paribas Group · Finance · Ukraine

Partial score · DNS & email only

61/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UKRSIBBANK BNP Paribas Group is a major Ukrainian bank established in 1990 and part of the international BNP Paribas financial group since 2006. It offers a wide range of banking and financial services targeting private individuals, small and medium businesses, corporate and premium clients. The bank positions itself as a modern, innovative institution adapting to changing market realities and emphasizing sustainable development and social responsibility. The website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence with clear branding and extensive product information. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js, with integration of Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for security and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though some accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and anti-bot measures, but lacks some security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the bank demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure and a solid security baseline appropriate for a financial institution. The domain registration data aligns well with the bank's history and legitimacy, reinforcing trustworthiness. However, improvements in privacy compliance and security header implementation are recommended to enhance user trust and regulatory adherence. Strategic recommendations include implementing a cookie consent banner, publishing incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies, enhancing accessibility compliance, and regularly auditing third-party scripts for vulnerabilities.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ukrsibbank.com

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
61

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

UKRSIBBANK holds a strong market position as one of Ukraine's top ten banks and benefits from its affiliation with BNP Paribas Group, a leading European financial institution. Its business model focuses on diversified financial products including cards, loans, deposits, insurance, and investment services. The bank targets a broad customer base from private individuals to corporate clients, with specialized offerings for premium customers. The website content and structured data indicate a transparent and customer-centric approach, supported by active social media engagement and customer feedback mechanisms. The bank's commitment to sustainability and social responsibility aligns with global standards, enhancing its competitive advantage and brand reputation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from automated abuse, and integrates nonce tokens for form submissions, indicating good security hygiene. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of publicly available incident response or vulnerability disclosure information may limit transparency. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by adopting additional HTTP security headers and publishing formal security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a clear cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and plugins to prevent supply chain risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
АТ «УКРСИББАНК»
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UKRSIBBANK BNP Paribas Group
Description
UKRSIBBANK BNP Paribas Group — український банк, заснований 1990 року, входить до десятки найбільших в Україні. Банк для світу, що змінюється. Частина міжнародної фінансової групи BNP Paribas з 2006 року.
Key services
Карткові продукти, Кредити, Депозити, Інтернет-банкінг UKRSIB online, Страхування, Платіжні та переказні послуги
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Swiper.js, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, MonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin), WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 for forms
  • No exposed credentials in HTML
  • Use of security nonce tokens in forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is comprehensive and professionally presented in Ukrainian language.
  3. Strong affiliation with BNP Paribas Group is clearly stated and supported by structured data.
  4. Multiple contact methods including phone, email, physical address, and feedback forms are provided.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  6. Security measures like HTTPS and reCAPTCHA are implemented, but some security headers are missing.
  7. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected, which may be a compliance gap.
  8. No visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information publicly available.
  9. Good SEO and social media integration.
  10. Business information is transparent and consistent with WHOIS data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements. It uses Google Tag Manager and MonsterInsights for analytics and tracking, and Microsoft Clarity for user behavior analysis. The site loads asynchronously optimized scripts and styles, indicating attention to performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. However, some accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The site does not reveal hosting provider details explicitly. Overall, the technical implementation is robust and suitable for a large financial institution, with opportunities for further modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ukrsibbank.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ukrsibbank.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.