Skip to main content

Security report for uhotelsgroup.com

Unique Hotels Group · Hospitality · Estonia

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Unique Hotels Group operates a small portfolio of lifestyle hotels in Estonia, focusing on boutique hospitality experiences with historical ambiance and modern amenities. Their services include hotel accommodations, dining, spa treatments, seminars, and gift cards, targeting tourists and business travelers. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with modern technologies and supports multiple languages. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented, and contact information is clearly provided. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy, though the website content and business information appear authentic. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, but security headers are missing, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the website is functional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in the hospitality market in Estonia.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uhotelsgroup.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche boutique hotel group in Estonia with five distinct hotel properties. Their competitive advantage lies in combining historical settings with lifestyle branding. Revenue streams include room bookings, dining, spa services, and event hosting. The partnership ecosystem includes individual hotel domains and a booking service provider. The website's multilingual support and social media presence indicate a focus on international and local markets. The lack of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly that should be investigated further to ensure domain ownership transparency.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, indicating awareness of privacy compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No visible forms on the homepage reduce attack surface, but no dedicated security or incident response information is available. The missing WHOIS data is a significant trust concern. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish an incident response policy or security contact information to improve transparency and readiness for security events.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure they comply with privacy regulations and do not introduce vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Unique Hotels Group
Description
Unique Hotels Group is a small group of lifestyle hotels operating five hotels in Tallinn and Lääne-Virumaa, Estonia. Their aim is to make stays memorable and comfortable, offering historical ambiance combined with modern conveniences.
Key services
Hotel accommodation, Dining, Spa services, Seminars and events, Gift cards
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, WPML (multilingual plugin), Yoast SEO, Autoptimize
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear navigation and multilingual support
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented and linked
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, and physical address
  5. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  8. No visible forms collecting personal data on homepage
  9. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Slick Carousel, and Google Analytics integrations. It uses WPML for multilingual support and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. Performance is moderate with lazy loading and caching optimizations. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and accessible navigation. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses external booking and social media services, integrating well with partner domains. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation is lacking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uhotelsgroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uhotelsgroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.