Skip to main content

Security report for udensroze.eu

Ūdensroze · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ūdensroze is a Latvian private mental health and wellness clinic with over 15 years of experience, offering a wide range of psychiatric and psychological services for adults and children, including specialized VIP programs. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides comprehensive information about their specialists, services, and client testimonials, establishing strong trust and credibility. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern libraries and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for minimal user tracking, while implementing GDPR-compliant cookie consent and privacy policies. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, though some security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. WHOIS data is privacy protected by EURid, which is common for EU domains, and while domain age cannot be confirmed, the business claims long-standing operation. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy, professional healthcare provider with a solid digital presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching udensroze.eu

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The clinic targets individuals seeking mental health services in Latvia, including adults, children, and VIP clients, positioning itself as a reputable private healthcare provider with a multidisciplinary team of psychiatrists and clinical psychologists. Their business model revolves around direct patient consultations, therapy sessions, and specialized health programs, including international wellness retreats in Italy. The presence of client testimonials and detailed specialist profiles enhances their competitive advantage. The partnership with piearsta.lv suggests integration with local healthcare platforms. The company maintains active social media channels to engage with clients and promote services. Growth indicators include expanding VIP offerings and continuous professional development of staff.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and secure handling of user data via forms with nonce tokens. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR, and privacy policies are clearly presented. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a published security policy or incident response plan indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and MapTiler is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for security. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by implementing additional headers and formalizing vulnerability disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  5. Enhance business credibility by adding terms of service and more detailed company registration information on the website.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ūdensroze
Description
Mentālās veselības un garīgās labklājības privātklīnika “Ūdensroze”, kas ar lepnumu nozarē darbojās jau vairāk nekā 15 gadus.
Key services
Psihiatra konsultācijas, Klīniskā psihologa konsultācijas, Ģimenes terapija, Kognitīvi biheiviorālā terapija (KBT), Mākslas terapija, Ergoterapija, Fizioterapija, Jogas nodarbības, VIP programmas veselības atjaunošanai Itālijā
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Leaflet.js, MapTiler SDK, FancyApps UI Carousel and Fancybox
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure contact form with nonce token

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to EURid privacy protection.
  3. Website uses HTTPS with no visible SSL issues.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, physical address, and contact form.
  6. Social media presence on Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook.
  7. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  9. Website is built on WordPress with modern frontend libraries.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging modern frontend libraries such as jQuery, FancyApps UI for carousels and modals, Leaflet.js for interactive maps, and MapTiler SDK for map rendering. Google Fonts are used for typography, and Google Tag Manager with Google Analytics is integrated for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and preconnect hints for fonts. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though hosting provider details are not disclosed. There is room for improvement in security header implementation and formalizing security-related documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with udensroze.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review udensroze.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.