Skip to main content

Security report for ublg.cz

Ústav biologie a lékařské genetiky 2. LF UK a FN Motol · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website ublg.cz represents the Ústav biologie a lékařské genetiky 2. LF UK a FN Motol, an academic and healthcare institute affiliated with Charles University and the Motol University Hospital in the Czech Republic. It serves as an informational and service portal for patients, students, and laboratory service applicants, providing access to satisfaction surveys, genetic counseling information, educational videos, and event registration. The site is modest in size and scope, targeting a specialized audience in healthcare and education sectors. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as Bootstrap 5 for responsive design and is structured with clean HTML5 markup. However, it lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features and does not appear to use a CMS or advanced analytics tools. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization but basic accessibility. From a security perspective, the site is accessible over HTTPS (assumed from domain context though SSL details not provided), but lacks visible security headers and published security or privacy policies. No contact information or incident response channels are provided, which limits transparency and user trust. The WHOIS data is consistent and supports the legitimacy of the domain, which has been active since 2011. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security hardening, and clearer contact and policy disclosures to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ublg.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
15
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ublg.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ublg.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institute operates within the healthcare and education sectors, focusing on genetics and medical biology. Its market position is niche and academic, serving university students, hospital patients, and laboratory service users. The business model is institutional, providing educational content, patient information, and service access rather than commercial offerings. Revenue streams are likely internal or public funding rather than direct sales. The partnership with the Motol University Hospital strengthens its credibility and reach. Growth indicators are stable given the long domain age and institutional backing. The partnership ecosystem includes the hospital and university websites, with no commercial subsidiaries or affiliates detected.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic. The site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, indicating no aggressive security controls. Lack of security headers and absence of privacy and cookie policies indicate compliance gaps with GDPR and best practices. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. No analytics or tracking scripts reduce privacy risks but also limit user behavior insights. The absence of contact information for security or data protection officers reduces transparency. Overall, the site is low risk but would benefit from improved security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify certificate validity.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to meet GDPR requirements and inform users.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general inquiries and incident response.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ústav biologie a lékařské genetiky 2. LF UK a FN Motol
Description
Webové stránky Ústavu biologie a lékařské genetiky 2. LF UK a FN Motol, součást webu Fakultní nemocnice v Motole, poskytující informace o institutu, laboratorních službách, genetickém poradenství, výuce a registraci na akce.
Key services
Laboratory services satisfaction survey, Genetic counseling information, Educational video lectures, Event registration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.3.2, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an academic and healthcare institute site with clear institutional affiliation.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the main page.
  4. Uses modern Bootstrap framework for responsive design.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. No security headers or explicit security policies found.
  7. WHOIS data is consistent and domain age supports legitimacy.
  8. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
  9. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Bootstrap 5.3.2 for responsive design and standard HTML5 markup. No CMS or advanced frameworks detected. External resources are loaded from trusted CDNs (jsdelivr.net). The site is mobile optimized with a clear navigation structure. However, SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal user tracking. Performance is moderate with no obvious issues but could be improved with caching and optimization. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but basic, with opportunities for modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ublg.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ublg.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.