Skip to main content

Security report for tyger.sk

Tyger.sk · Media · Slovakia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tyger.sk is a Slovak-language outdoor equipment review and project blog focused on hiking, climbing, ski mountaineering, and running. Established in 2013, it serves a niche audience of outdoor enthusiasts in Slovakia and surrounding regions. The website offers detailed reviews and trip reports, positioning itself as a trusted source for outdoor gear and adventure content. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins like Yoast SEO and NextGen Gallery, hosted by Websupport with DNSSEC enabled and HTTPS enforced, reflecting a solid digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with standard protections, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are missing. The site integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for user tracking, but lacks visible cookie consent mechanisms and privacy disclosures, which are areas for compliance improvement. Overall, the website is professional, content-rich, and trustworthy, but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security transparency to improve user trust and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tyger.sk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tyger.sk operates as a content publishing platform targeting outdoor enthusiasts interested in gear reviews and mountain projects. Its business model likely relies on affiliate marketing and advertising, as indicated by affiliate links and ad banners. The site maintains an active social media presence across Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube, supporting community engagement and content distribution. The partnership with treking.cz suggests collaboration within the outdoor media niche. The domain age and consistent content updates indicate a stable market presence. The site’s focus on Slovak outdoor activities positions it well within a specialized regional market, with potential for growth through expanded content and monetization strategies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and DNSSEC enabled, reducing risks of interception and DNS spoofing. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options limits protection against common web attacks. No security policy or incident response information is publicly available, which may hinder transparency and readiness. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel introduces tracking but no visible consent mechanism is present, raising privacy compliance concerns. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, security practices are adequate but could be strengthened with enhanced headers, privacy policies, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and incident response.
  4. Display clear contact information including company email and phone number to improve business credibility.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tyger.sk
Description
Stránka tyger.sk sa zaoberá outdoor tematikou v rámci recenzii výbavy do hôr. Taktiež tu nájdete aj skialpové, lezecké a bežecké výlety.
Key services
Outdoor equipment reviews, Outdoor project articles, Ski mountaineering, climbing, running trip reports
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.4.5, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, AddThis sharing tools, jQuery, Magnific Popup, NextGen Gallery, FontAwesome
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
AddThis Share Buttons
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Slovak outdoor equipment review and project blog.
  2. Content is regularly updated with recent posts.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found.
  4. Uses standard WordPress plugins and common tracking tools.
  5. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage.
  6. Social media presence is strong with Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter links.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. Good SEO and structured data implementation.
  10. Hosting and domain registration consistent and legitimate.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with a well-known theme (ColorMag) and SEO plugin (Yoast). It uses standard web technologies including jQuery, FontAwesome, and Magnific Popup for UI enhancements. Hosting is provided by Websupport with DNSSEC enabled, indicating good DNS security practices. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics and tracking scripts. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO is enhanced by proper meta tags and structured JSON-LD data. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The site uses multiple social media integrations and sharing tools, supporting user engagement. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from improved accessibility and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tyger.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tyger.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.