Skip to main content

Security report for tvora.lv

UAB Tvora · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB Tvora is a fencing solutions provider specializing in manufacturing and selling a wide range of fencing products including metal, concrete, wood, wire, and composite fences. The company targets private landowners, industrial, and agricultural sectors primarily in Latvia and neighboring countries. Their website features a fence price calculator and detailed product catalogs, indicating a customer-centric approach with digital tools to enhance user experience. Technically, the website uses modern JavaScript libraries and Google services, with a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data, though security headers are not explicitly detected and could be improved. Overall, the site is professional, well-structured, and trustworthy, but the lack of WHOIS data transparency slightly reduces domain trustworthiness. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing explicit security policies, and maintaining up-to-date third-party libraries.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tvora.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate and manufacturing sectors, focusing on fencing products and installation services. Their business model combines manufacturing with direct sales and installation, supported by digital tools like an online fence price calculator. The multi-country presence and localized websites suggest a regional expansion strategy. The website content is professionally presented with clear navigation and product segmentation, supporting effective customer engagement. The absence of explicit contact emails but presence of phone and social media contacts indicates a preference for direct communication channels. The company leverages Google and Facebook analytics for marketing and retargeting, indicating active digital marketing efforts. No suspicious domains or affiliate programs were detected, reinforcing a straightforward business approach.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent banner with opt-in/out options, demonstrating compliance with privacy regulations. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, or X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement in defense-in-depth strategies. The use of third-party libraries like jQuery and Fancybox requires regular updates to mitigate known vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy pages were found, which could enhance transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened with additional controls and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update all third-party JavaScript libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Add explicit contact email addresses for customer support and security incident reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security assessments to maintain compliance and security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB Tvora
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB Tvora
Description
UAB “TVORA” offers fencing solutions for private land plots, industrial areas, and agricultural territories. They manufacture and sell a wide range of fences including metal, concrete, wood, wire, and plastic composite fences. The site includes a fence price calculator and detailed product categories.
Key services
Fence manufacturing, Fence sales, Fence installation services, Fence price calculation tool
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Fancybox, Isotope, Google Tag Manager, CookieYes cookie consent
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
doubleclick.net, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and product information.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and GDPR compliant.
  3. No contact email explicitly found in HTML content; phone number and social media links are present.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  5. Use of multiple JavaScript libraries and Google services indicates moderate technical maturity.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding for improved security.
  7. No forms detected in the provided HTML content for direct user data collection.
  8. Business targets fencing and related construction markets in Latvia and neighboring countries.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery (multiple versions), Fancybox, Isotope, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a moderately complex front-end stack. The presence of a cookie consent solution (CookieYes) shows attention to privacy compliance. The site loads resources from reputable CDNs and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and image sliders. Mobile optimization is good with viewport meta tags and responsive slides. SEO is supported by meta descriptions, keywords, and structured data (JSON-LD) describing the business. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not available from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional website with opportunities for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tvora.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tvora.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.