Skip to main content

Security report for tvo.de

TV Oberfranken · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TV Oberfranken operates as a regional media broadcaster serving the Oberfranken region in Germany, providing news and television content to approximately one million residents. The website functions as a digital platform for news dissemination, livestreaming, and media library access, targeting local audiences in cities such as Bamberg, Bayreuth, and Coburg. The business model centers on regional broadcasting and news reporting, positioning TV Oberfranken as a key local media outlet.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tvo.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages its regional focus to maintain a strong presence in the Oberfranken media market. Its competitive advantage lies in localized content tailored to the specific interests of its audience. Revenue streams likely include advertising and sponsorships typical for regional broadcasters. The website's partnership with hosting providers like Hochfranken-Online and use of modern web technologies indicates a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of detailed business contact information and privacy policies suggests areas for improvement in transparency and compliance.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses Matomo analytics and hCaptcha for user interaction and bot mitigation. However, the lack of visible security headers and absence of published security or incident response policies indicate a moderate security maturity level. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but the site would benefit from enhanced security practices such as implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear incident response contacts. Compliance with GDPR is not clearly demonstrated, which is a potential compliance gap.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including security incident response channels.
  4. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency and trust by adding certifications or trust seals relevant to media and data protection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TV Oberfranken
Description
News aus Oberfranken: TV Oberfranken (TVO) berichtet aus Bamberg, Bayreuth, Coburg, Forchheim, Hof, Kulmbach, Kronach, Lichtenfels und Wunsiedel für eine Million Oberfranken.
Key services
News reporting, Television broadcasting, Livestream, Mediathek (media library)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Video.js, Swiper.js, Matomo Analytics, AMP (Accelerated Mobile Pages), Google IMA SDK, hCaptcha
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional media broadcaster for Oberfranken, Germany.
  2. Content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided content.
  5. Uses Matomo analytics and hCaptcha for bot protection.
  6. No security headers or advanced security policies detected in the provided data.
  7. Good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags present.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Video.js for video playback, Swiper.js for UI components, and Matomo for analytics, indicating a contemporary approach to web development. The presence of AMP links suggests efforts toward mobile optimization and performance. Hosting appears regional, aligning with the business focus. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO meta tags. However, the absence of explicit CMS identification and security headers suggests some technical debt and opportunities for modernization, particularly in security and compliance infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tvo.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tvo.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.