Skip to main content

Security report for tubewolf.com

Tube Wolf · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tube Wolf is an adult entertainment website specializing in free streaming of pornographic videos sourced from various studios. The platform offers a wide range of adult content categories and regularly updates its video library to attract and retain an adult audience. The business model is primarily advertising-supported, leveraging affiliate partnerships and ad networks to generate revenue. The website has been operational since 2009, positioning itself as a medium-sized player in the adult media industry. Technically, the site uses legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.9.1 alongside custom scripts and Google Analytics for tracking. While the site enforces HTTPS and includes a basic Content-Security-Policy header, it lacks several modern security headers and uses outdated libraries, which could expose it to vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is minimal, with a privacy policy and terms of service present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR-specific features detected. The WHOIS data is unavailable, raising concerns about domain registration transparency and trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional and content-rich but would benefit from technical and security modernization and improved privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tubewolf.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tube Wolf operates in the adult media sector, targeting adult consumers seeking free pornographic content. Its competitive advantage lies in a large, frequently updated video library and a broad category offering. The site leverages partnerships with other adult networks and affiliate programs to enhance monetization. The business relies heavily on advertising revenue and affiliate marketing. Growth indicators include consistent content updates and integration with multiple partner sites. However, the lack of transparent company information and domain registration details may impact business credibility. The partnership ecosystem is robust within the adult entertainment niche, but no clear parent or subsidiary relationships are identified.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and a Content-Security-Policy header enforcing upgrade of insecure requests. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version (1.9.1) introduces potential security vulnerabilities. The absence of additional security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit incident response or security policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. Privacy compliance is limited, with no cookie consent mechanism detected, which may expose the site to regulatory risks in certain jurisdictions. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to reduce risk exposure and enhance user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and a stricter Content-Security-Policy.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency and security culture.
  5. Investigate and resolve WHOIS registration transparency issues to enhance domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tube Wolf
Description
Tube Wolf provides free pornographic videos streamed daily from porn movie studios, offering a large collection of adult content including various categories and scenes.
Key services
Free streaming of adult videos, Categorized adult content, Pornstar profiles, Search functionality
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.9.1, Google Tag Manager (gtag.js), HTML5, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content-Security-Policy header present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Pignr
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a free adult video streaming platform with extensive content.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating privacy or registration issues.
  3. Basic privacy and terms pages present but no cookie consent mechanism detected.
  4. Uses outdated jQuery version which may pose security risks.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found.
  6. Advertising and affiliate links are prevalent.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  8. Content is clearly adult and NSFW, targeting adult users only.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a legacy technology stack with jQuery 1.9.1 and custom JavaScript files for video sharing and main functionality. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for user tracking and marketing analytics. The site is served over HTTPS with a basic Content-Security-Policy header. The HTML structure is well-formed with meta tags for SEO and Open Graph for social sharing. Mobile optimization is basic with a separate mobile URL provided. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The site lacks a modern CMS indication and hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical debt is evident in outdated libraries and limited security headers, suggesting modernization opportunities to improve security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tubewolf.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tubewolf.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.