Skip to main content

Security report for tubegalore.com

Tube Galore · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tube Galore is an adult entertainment website offering a vast database of free and premium pornographic videos, categorized extensively and available in multiple languages. The platform targets adult users seeking diverse adult video content and operates primarily as a content aggregator with monetization likely through advertising and premium memberships. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, CSS3, and Google Tag Manager for analytics, with a responsive design optimized for mobile devices. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Overall, the site provides a professional user experience but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tubegalore.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website holds a strong market position as a large-scale adult content aggregator with millions of videos and extensive categorization, appealing to a broad adult audience globally. Its business model revolves around free content supported by advertising and premium content subscriptions. The multi-language support indicates a strategy to capture diverse international markets. The lack of visible company contact information and domain registration details limits trust and may impact partnerships or regulatory compliance. The use of Google Tag Manager suggests active user behavior tracking for marketing optimization. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data provided.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate; HTTPS is enforced, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies was found, and no contact channels for security issues are provided. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and lack of GDPR indicators. The site uses forms with input validation for search but does not display advanced security measures. Overall, the security posture requires improvements to meet industry best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts to facilitate communication and trust.
  4. Verify and publish domain WHOIS information to improve legitimacy and transparency.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and implement vulnerability disclosure programs.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tube Galore
Description
A huge database of free porn, millions of porn tube videos sorted by category. This is the only porn resource you'll ever need!
Key services
Free porn video streaming, Premium membership content, Video search and categorization, Multi-language site versions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, FontAwesome, Google Tag Manager, HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • Search form with autocomplete and input validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a large adult video content aggregator with millions of videos
  2. Multi-language support with many localized versions
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided HTML
  4. No explicit contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found
  5. Uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking
  6. No WHOIS data available, raising questions about domain registration legitimacy
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. Site uses HTTPS as per canonical link
  9. Forms present for video search with autocomplete functionality
  10. No social media links or company contact information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with asynchronous JavaScript loading, CSS3 styling, and integration of Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and supports multiple languages, indicating a mature technical infrastructure. However, no CMS or backend technologies were identified. Performance appears moderate with preconnect and DNS-prefetch hints for CDN domains, suggesting content delivery optimization. The absence of detected security headers and incomplete WHOIS data indicate areas for technical improvement. Overall, the technical implementation supports a large content platform but requires enhancements in security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tubegalore.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tubegalore.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.