Skip to main content

Security report for tsholesov.cz

TAS Holešov, s.r.o. · Energy · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Network security.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TAS Holešov, s.r.o. is a municipal services company formed in 2024 by merging two local entities, providing energy, waste management, property management, and recreational services primarily for the Holešov region in the Czech Republic. The website reflects a well-structured local government service portal with clear navigation and relevant content for residents and businesses. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Swiper.js, and Google Maps API, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks advanced security headers and incident response contact details. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, though WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tsholesov.cz

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
95
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in essential municipal sectors including energy and waste management, targeting local residents and businesses. Its business model is service-oriented with a focus on public utility and community services. The presence of partner links to the official city website and detailed contact information supports its legitimacy and local market position. The company appears medium-sized with a recent founding date, indicating a new but established presence in the local market. The website content and structure support transparency and user engagement, with no signs of commercial advertising or affiliate marketing.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent banner, demonstrating basic security and privacy compliance. However, it lacks visible HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. No incident response or abuse contact information is provided. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Consider adding analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to monitor site usage.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
TAS Holešov, s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TAS Holešov, s.r.o.
Description
Společnost TAS Holešov, s.r.o. vznikla k 1. 1. 2024 sloučením společností Tepelné Hospodářství Holešov, spol. s r. o. a Technických služeb Holešov, s.r.o.
Key services
Energetika, Správa nemovitostí, Odpady, Sportcentrum Holešov, Veřejná zeleň, Veřejné osvětlení, Údržba komunikací, Hřbitov
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, FontAwesome, Swiper.js, Fancybox, Google Maps API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy-protected, limiting domain registration insights.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present, indicating GDPR compliance.
  4. Contact information is detailed and consistent with business operations.
  5. No security.txt or incident response contact found, representing an area for improvement.
  6. Website uses modern JS libraries and Google Maps integration.
  7. No social media links are present on the site.
  8. No analytics or tracking services detected beyond cookie consent script.
  9. Content is relevant to municipal services and local community.
  10. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard web technologies including jQuery, FontAwesome, Swiper.js for sliders, and Fancybox for galleries. Google Maps API integration provides location services. The site uses custom CSS and JavaScript files, indicating a bespoke or semi-custom CMS or framework. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and the site is mobile responsive. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. No CMS or hosting provider information is directly detectable from the HTML. The site could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tsholesov.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tsholesov.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.