Skip to main content

Security report for tschechische-gebirge.de

eProgress s.r.o. · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.tschechische-gebirge.de is a well-established online platform operated by eProgress s.r.o., specializing in providing comprehensive accommodation listings in the Czech mountain regions. It offers direct contact between guests and property owners, emphasizing no commission fees, which positions it as a trusted and cost-effective resource for travelers. The platform includes additional services such as weather updates, webcams, and last-minute deals, enhancing user engagement and utility. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Tailwind CSS and JavaScript, with integration of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for data insights, all served over HTTPS ensuring secure connections. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR-aligned privacy policies. Security posture is solid with SSL enabled and CSRF tokens present, though some security headers could be improved. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with good content quality and user experience, suitable for its target audience of tourists and travelers seeking mountain accommodations in the Czech Republic.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tschechische-gebirge.de

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
45
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector with a focus on direct accommodation bookings in Czech mountain regions. It leverages a commission-free model, allowing property owners to list directly, which is a competitive advantage. The company has a long operational history since 1999, indicating market stability and trust. Its partnership ecosystem includes sister sites for Slovak and Croatian accommodations, broadening its regional reach. The platform targets tourists looking for affordable and direct booking options, supported by extensive content including weather and webcam information. Revenue likely derives from advertising and premium listing services. The company maintains a medium size with a consistent brand and a strong online presence in its niche.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS enforced and a CSRF token implemented to protect forms. Cookie consent is actively managed, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The use of third-party analytics scripts is controlled via consent, reducing privacy risks. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the site maintains a secure environment appropriate for its business model but could benefit from additional security hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to avoid introducing vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Consider adding explicit contact emails and phone numbers for customer support to increase trust and ease of communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
eProgress s.r.o.
Description
Die größte Informationsmenge über tschechische Gebirge an einem Ort. Billigste Unterkunft ohne Provision.
Key services
Accommodation listings, Direct contact to property owners, Last minute offers, Weather and webcam information, Seasonal and regional guides
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3 (Tailwind CSS), JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CSRF token meta tag

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
toplist.cz, toplist.sk
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is comprehensive and focused on Czech mountain accommodations.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML; contact form link provided.
  5. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager with consent indicates moderate tracking.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in provided data; SSL is enabled.
  7. Business is operated by eProgress s.r.o., a known entity in the hospitality sector.
  8. Website uses custom CMS with modern CSS and JavaScript.
  9. Multiple external domains linked for partner sites and analytics.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom CMS platform using modern frontend technologies such as Tailwind CSS and JavaScript. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and marketing purposes, with proper cookie consent mechanisms in place. Hosting is provided by Forpsi, a reputable Czech hosting provider, as indicated by the nameservers. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. SEO is supported by proper meta tags including keywords and description. No CMS like WordPress or Joomla was detected, indicating a bespoke solution. Technical debt appears low, but security headers and accessibility could be improved to modern standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tschechische-gebirge.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tschechische-gebirge.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.