Skip to main content

Security report for trygghem.se

Trygghem Bostads AB · Real Estate · Sweden

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Trygghem Bostads AB is a Swedish real estate company specializing in land development and new construction of residential and community properties primarily in the Stockholm metropolitan area and Mälardalen region. The company targets investors and property buyers interested in these geographic markets. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and related plugins, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity with a professional design and good mobile optimization. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and public security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site presents a credible business presence but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching trygghem.se

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate sector with a focus on regional development projects. Its business model centers on property development and sales, targeting regional investors and residents. The website content includes news updates indicating active business operations. The lack of detailed corporate disclosures such as founding year or subsidiaries limits deeper business intelligence. No partnerships or related domains were identified. The company maintains clear contact information and branding consistency, supporting moderate trustworthiness.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which is a gap in security transparency. No forms or input fields are present on the homepage, reducing immediate attack surface. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR best practices. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be improved to reduce risk and enhance user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly disclose a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and provide contact channels for security issues to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and scripts to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve user experience and search engine ranking.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Trygghem Bostads AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Trygghem Bostads AB
Description
TryggHem är ett fastighetsbolag vars affärsidé består av markutveckling samt nyproduktion av bostäder och samhällsfastigheter. Bolagets verksamhet är fokuserad på stor-Stockholmsregionen samt Mälardalen.
Key services
Land development, New residential construction, Community property development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Jet Plugins, jQuery, Swiper.js, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional WordPress site focused on real estate development in Sweden
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. Contact information is clearly provided in the footer
  4. No security or incident response policies publicly disclosed
  5. No visible tracking or analytics scripts detected
  6. No forms present on the homepage for data collection
  7. Site uses HTTPS and modern frontend technologies
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and several Jet plugins, indicating a modern and flexible infrastructure. It uses jQuery, Swiper.js for UI components, and Font Awesome for icons. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and Google Fonts CDN. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators found. Mobile optimization is good due to responsive design. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA labels and skip links present. SEO is basic with meta viewport and canonical tags but lacks structured data like JSON-LD. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with trygghem.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review trygghem.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.