Skip to main content

Security report for tryg.no

Tryg Forsikring · Finance · Norway

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tryg Forsikring is a major Norwegian insurance company providing a range of insurance products for individuals and families, including property and personal insurance. The website is professionally designed, with consistent branding and clear content targeting Norwegian customers. It offers online insurance services with benefits such as a 10% online discount. The company maintains a strong market position in the Norwegian finance sector. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Drupal CMS, Bootstrap for responsive design, and integrates advanced tag management and analytics tools such as Tealium and Adobe Experience Cloud. The site is hosted on Amazon Web Services, ensuring scalability and reliability. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are well implemented, contributing to a good user experience. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, security headers are not explicitly detected, and no public security policy or incident response contact is found. The absence of WHOIS data suggests privacy protection for domain registration, which is justified for a large financial institution. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be enhanced by publishing additional security policies and headers. The overall risk assessment is low, with no critical vulnerabilities or suspicious indicators detected. Strategic recommendations include improving security header implementation, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and enhancing contact information transparency to further build trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tryg.no

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tryg Forsikring operates in the Norwegian insurance market, targeting individuals and families with various insurance products. The company leverages digital channels to offer online insurance purchases and benefits, positioning itself as a customer-centric insurer. Its use of advanced analytics and marketing tools indicates a data-driven approach to customer engagement and campaign effectiveness. The business model focuses on direct-to-consumer sales supported by digital marketing and personalized content. The company likely enjoys a large customer base and strong brand recognition in Norway. Partnerships with analytics and marketing service providers enhance its operational capabilities. No evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies was found in the provided data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a detailed cookie consent mechanism that categorizes cookies by purpose and provides user control, supporting GDPR compliance. The use of session cookies and secure tag management tools indicates attention to session security and data governance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No public security policy or incident response contact information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is good but can be improved by adopting additional security best practices and publishing relevant policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Expand contact information to include verified company emails and physical addresses to enhance business credibility.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and cookies to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and minimize tracking risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Tryg Forsikring
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tryg Forsikring
Description
Forsikring for deg, familien og eiendelene dine. Få 10 % nettrabatt og andre fordeler som gjør livet tryggere. Sjekk pris og kjøp forsikring.
Key services
Insurance for individuals, Family insurance, Property insurance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Bootstrap CSS, Tealium Tag Management, Cookie Information Consent Management, Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Session cookies with appropriate scope

Analytics and tracking

Services
Qualtrics, Bmetric, Adobe Experience Cloud
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Adobe Audience Manager, Adobe Experience Cloud
Tracking pixels
Tealium, Qualtrics, Bmetric
Marketing tools
Tealium Tag Management, Adobe Experience Cloud
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed cookie categories and descriptions.
  3. Privacy policy is present, detailed, and GDPR compliant.
  4. No explicit terms of service page found.
  5. Contact information limited to phone number in structured data; no email or physical address found in provided content.
  6. Uses modern technologies and tag management systems for analytics and marketing.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection.
  9. Website content is professional and relevant to insurance services.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS with Bootstrap framework for responsive design, ensuring good mobile optimization and accessibility. It integrates multiple third-party services for analytics, tag management, and marketing, including Tealium, Adobe Experience Cloud, Qualtrics, and Bmetric. Hosting is provided by Amazon Web Services, indicating a robust and scalable infrastructure. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized CSS usage. The site includes comprehensive cookie consent management with detailed categorization and user controls. Technical debt appears low, but there is room for improvement in security header implementation and possibly SEO enhancements. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tryg.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tryg.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.