Skip to main content

Security report for truffle-bee.com

TRUFFLE BEE · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TRUFFLE BEE is a niche luxury table textiles manufacturer and online retailer, specializing in unique and elegant tableware and home decor products. The company targets consumers who appreciate eclectic design and joyful hosting experiences. The website is built on the Bitrix CMS platform and integrates modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Yandex Metrika. The technical infrastructure is moderate in performance with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, though DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are lacking. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy and terms of service present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy e-commerce platform with room for security and privacy enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching truffle-bee.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
55
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail and e-commerce sectors, focusing on luxury table textiles and home decor. Founded in 2019, it maintains a small business size with a clear market niche. The business model centers on direct online sales with curated collections and bespoke offerings. The presence of gift cards and a variety of product categories indicates diversified revenue streams. Social media integration and marketing tools suggest active customer engagement and brand building. The domain registration and website content are consistent, supporting legitimacy and trust. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options represents potential areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Incident response and security policy documentation are not found, indicating a gap in formal security governance. Privacy compliance is partial, lacking explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business scale but should be enhanced to mitigate risks and improve compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, etc.) to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Develop and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TRUFFLE BEE
Description
Manufacturer of unique luxury table textiles and home decor designer. Offers a curated selection of table textiles, tableware, wood products, home decor, gifts, and bespoke items. Focus on eclectic design, joyful hosting, and elegant, imaginative decor.
Key services
Manufacturing luxury table textiles, Online retail of tableware and home decor, Gift cards and bespoke product offerings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bitrix CMS, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Bitrix Framework
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
Bitrix24 CRM site button
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform for luxury table textiles and home decor.
  2. Uses Bitrix CMS with modern tracking and marketing tools.
  3. Clear contact information and legal pages present.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  5. Minor security improvements recommended.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Bitrix CMS platform, leveraging JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and modern tracking technologies including Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. Hosting is managed through REG.RU with DNS services via Cloudflare, providing reliable infrastructure. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with some lazy loading and asynchronous script loading to improve user experience. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The technical stack is modern but would benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with truffle-bee.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review truffle-bee.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.