Skip to main content

Security report for trouw.nl

DPG Media · Media · Netherlands

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DPG Media operates a privacy consent gate service for its media properties, including trouw.nl. The service is designed to manage user consent for privacy and cookie usage in compliance with GDPR requirements. The page analyzed is a minimal functional gate that blocks access until consent is provided, limiting content visibility and analysis. The technical infrastructure includes JavaScript and Google Tag Manager for tracking, hosted on DPG Media's own domains. The security posture is moderate but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or security policies on this page. Overall, the site is consistent with a large media company but the privacy gate limits content and transparency, impacting user experience and compliance visibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching trouw.nl

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
80
Security headers
35
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DPG Media is a major media company in the Netherlands with a strong market position in publishing and digital media. The privacy gate is part of their compliance infrastructure to manage GDPR consent across their sites. The business model focuses on media publishing supported by advertising and user data consent management. The company targets a general audience in the Netherlands and operates at an enterprise scale. The privacy gate service is a critical component of their digital ecosystem, ensuring regulatory compliance and user trust. Partnerships and subsidiary information are not evident from this page.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate with HTTPS usage and Google Tag Manager integration. However, the absence of visible security headers and lack of explicit security or incident response policies on this page indicate room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but the privacy gate mechanism itself restricts full content access, which may impact transparency. Compliance with GDPR is implied but not explicitly demonstrated on this page. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not visible.

Recommendations

  1. Expose clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies linked from the consent gate page.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide visible contact information and security incident response details.
  4. Enhance transparency of data collection and retention policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  5. Consider improving content availability post-consent to enhance user experience and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. The page is a privacy consent gate with minimal content and a redirect mechanism, indicating content is blocked until consent is given. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
DPG Media
Description
DPG Media operates a privacy gate service for consent management related to its media properties, including the site trouw.nl.
Key services
privacy consent management, media publishing
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL scheme)
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. The page is a privacy consent gate blocking access until user consent is given.
  2. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service are directly present on this page.
  3. No contact information or security policies are visible.
  4. The page uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking.
  5. The content is minimal and primarily functional for consent management.
  6. No forms or user input fields are present on this page.
  7. The page is mobile optimized with responsive background images.
  8. Security headers and advanced security practices are not visible in the HTML content.
  9. The domain WHOIS data is consistent with the business identity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a JavaScript-based privacy gate with asynchronous scripts and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The hosting is managed by DPG Media's static content servers. The page is mobile responsive with adaptive background images. Performance is moderate given the minimal content and scripts. There is no evidence of a CMS or third-party frameworks beyond Google Tag Manager. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal due to the gate's blocking nature. Technical risks include lack of security headers and limited transparency on privacy and security policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with trouw.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review trouw.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.