Skip to main content

Security report for trojanbrands.com

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. · Retail · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Trojanbrands.com is the official website for Trojan™, a leading and trusted sexual health brand in the United States with a history spanning 100 years. The site offers a range of adult sexual health products including condoms, lubricants, sex toys, and supplements, targeting an adult audience seeking quality and trusted products. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, supporting a strong market position under the parent company Church & Dwight Co., Inc. The site integrates modern technologies such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Salesforce chat support, and OneTrust for cookie compliance, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is generally strong with HTTPS enforced and privacy policies linked to the parent company domain, although explicit security headers are not detected in the provided data. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is unusual and warrants further investigation, but the overall trustworthiness is supported by the brand's established reputation and external references. The site is not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms and is fully accessible.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching trojanbrands.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Trojan operates in the retail sector focusing on adult sexual health products. The business model combines e-commerce with brand marketing and educational content to engage consumers. The company leverages a broad social media presence across TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube to maintain brand visibility and customer engagement. The parent company, Church & Dwight Co., Inc., is a large enterprise with a diversified portfolio, providing strong backing. The website's content quality and professional presentation support a high level of business credibility. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a preference for contact forms and digital engagement channels. The partnership ecosystem includes Salesforce for customer service and OneTrust for privacy compliance, indicating a focus on regulatory adherence and customer experience.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates cookie consent mechanisms via OneTrust, indicating compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, no explicit security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, HSTS) were detected in the provided data, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. The use of multiple third-party scripts and services introduces potential risk vectors that require ongoing monitoring. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is publicly available, which is a gap in transparency and security readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
Description
Protect and enhance your sexual pleasure with Trojan™ condoms, lubricants and sex toys from America's most trusted sexual health brand for 100 years.
Key services
Condoms, Sex toys, Lubricants, Supplements
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Salesforce Embedded Service Chat, Cludo Search
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Salesforce Service Cloud (chat)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cludo Search, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. Content is professionally presented and consistent with a major brand.
  3. No explicit email addresses or phone numbers found on main page; contact via form only.
  4. Strong social media presence linked to official brand accounts.
  5. Use of multiple third-party services for analytics, search, and chat support.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked to parent company domain.
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is used.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and lowers trust score slightly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Salesforce Embedded Service for chat, and OneTrust for cookie consent management. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes SEO best practices such as meta descriptions and canonical links. Performance is moderate, with video content and multiple third-party scripts that may impact load times. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data. The technical implementation supports a professional user experience but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with trojanbrands.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review trojanbrands.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.