Skip to main content

Security report for trililie.cz

Hotel Tři lilie · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents Hotel Tři lilie, a historic hotel located in the center of Františkovy Lázně, Czech Republic. It targets tourists and visitors seeking accommodation with a traditional French charm. The business operates in the hospitality sector, offering hotel accommodation and related services. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and incorporates various third-party analytics and advertising technologies such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, Adform, and Facebook Pixel. A cookie consent mechanism is implemented, reflecting some level of privacy compliance. However, the absence of a visible privacy policy and terms of service pages limits full compliance assessment. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency and trustworthiness. Technically, the site uses older jQuery versions and lacks security headers, which could expose it to vulnerabilities. Overall, the site is functional and professionally presented but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching trililie.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention trililie.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for trililie.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The hotel positions itself as a historic and centrally located accommodation option in Františkovy Lázně, appealing primarily to tourists. Its business model revolves around hospitality services with a focus on leveraging its heritage and location. The website integrates multiple advertising and analytics partners, indicating a strategy to optimize marketing and user engagement. The presence of partner domains related to spa and hotel services suggests a networked ecosystem. However, the lack of explicit contact information and corporate details on the site may hinder customer trust and business transparency. Growth opportunities include improving digital presence with clearer business information and compliance documentation.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. It employs cookie consent tools to manage user privacy preferences. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense against common web attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version is a potential vulnerability vector. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities was found in the HTML content. The lack of a security.txt file or incident response contact information limits the site's readiness for vulnerability disclosure and incident handling. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to align with best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  2. Update JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions.
  3. Publish clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service documents on the website.
  4. Add visible and verified contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident communication.
  5. Create and maintain a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hotel Tři lilie
Description
Nejstarší hotel ve Františkových lázní typický svým francouzským šarmem, který se nachází přím v centru Františkových Lázní.
Key services
Hotel accommodation, Hospitality services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.9.1, jQuery UI, Divi theme v3.19.15, FontAwesome 5.7.2, Cookiebot, Hotjar, Google Tag Manager, Adform tracking
Frameworks
Divi WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Smartlook
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform, Facebook, Adition Technologies
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Smartlook
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Adform, Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS and modern tracking and analytics tools.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the analyzed page.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment.
  5. Multiple external domains related to advertising and analytics are linked.
  6. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected on this page.
  7. Site uses WordPress with Divi theme and older jQuery version.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, utilizing jQuery 1.9.1 and jQuery UI, which are outdated and may pose security risks. It integrates multiple third-party scripts for analytics (Google Analytics, Hotjar, Smartlook) and advertising (Adform, Facebook Pixel, Adition Technologies). The site loads multiple CSS and JS resources, including Google Fonts and FontAwesome icons, indicating a modern design approach. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the lack of security headers and outdated libraries indicate technical debt and potential risks. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but requires modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with trililie.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review trililie.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.