Skip to main content

Security report for tribune.cz

MEDICAL TRIBUNE CZ, s.r.o. · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MEDICAL TRIBUNE CZ, s.r.o. operates a specialized medical information portal targeting healthcare professionals in the Czech Republic. The website offers a broad range of content including news articles, specialized medical sections, educational courses, podcasts, and newsletters. The business model is subscription-based content publishing, positioning itself as a trusted source for medical professionals. The company maintains a professional and consistent brand presence with active social media channels and a clear focus on healthcare industry content. Technically, the website employs modern tracking and marketing technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and CookieYes for consent management. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, though no specific CMS or hosting provider was identified. Performance is moderate with good user experience and navigation clarity. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA on forms to prevent abuse. However, some security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not explicitly present, and no published security policy or incident response contacts are found. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency and trustworthiness, though the website content and structure indicate a legitimate and professional operation. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and well-suited for its target audience. Strategic improvements in security header implementation, publishing security policies, and improving WHOIS transparency would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tribune.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company is positioned as an important entity in the healthcare and media sectors, focusing on delivering specialized medical content to professionals. Its subscription and educational offerings suggest diversified revenue streams. The presence of payment processing partnerships indicates a mature commercial operation. The website's content and structure reflect a strong market position within the Czech healthcare information niche, with clear growth potential through educational services and digital media. Partnerships with payment gateways and design agencies support operational effectiveness. The lack of explicit company contact details on the site may limit direct customer engagement but is mitigated by contact forms and social media presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA to protect forms. Cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of key security headers and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. The missing WHOIS data further reduces trust and complicates domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is secure for general use but would benefit from enhanced security best practices and transparency to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to strengthen security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain registration transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance direct contact information availability for business and security inquiries to foster trust and engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MEDICAL TRIBUNE CZ, s.r.o.
Description
Informační portál nakladatelství MEDICAL TRIBUNE CZ, s.r.o. určený odborníkům pracujícím ve zdravotnictví. Najdete zde obsahy titulů, aktuality, dokumenty, email servis a mnohé další...
Key services
Medical news articles, Specialized medical sections, Educational courses and tests, Podcasts and videos, Newsletter subscription
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, reCAPTCHA, jQuery, CookieYes Consent Management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Seznam Retargeting
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Revive Adserver
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
CookieYes Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional medical information portal targeting healthcare professionals in Czech Republic.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and includes multiple sections such as articles, special reports, multimedia, and educational courses.
  3. Strong use of tracking and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and CookieYes consent management.
  4. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces transparency.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML; contact is via contact page and forms.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and appear comprehensive and GDPR compliant.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe and professional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and CookieYes for consent management. It employs reCAPTCHA for form security and lazy loading for images to optimize performance. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. No specific CMS or hosting provider was identified from the HTML content. Performance is moderate with some external dependencies. The site could improve by adopting additional security headers and publishing more detailed technical and security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tribune.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tribune.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.