Skip to main content

Security report for trevlix.com

Trevlix · Hospitality · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Trevlix is a small hospitality technology company offering an online accommodation reservation system designed to increase direct bookings and simplify hotel management. Their SaaS platform includes a booking engine, channel manager, online payments, guest management, and analytics, targeting small to medium-sized accommodation providers. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation, supporting multiple languages and integrating modern JavaScript libraries. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though there is room for improvement in HTTP security headers and explicit incident response policies. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trust but the website's professionalism and valid contact information mitigate concerns. Overall, Trevlix presents a credible and functional online presence with a moderate risk profile.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching trevlix.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Trevlix occupies a niche in the hospitality software market, focusing on affordable and easy-to-use booking and channel management solutions. Their business model is subscription-based with a free trial, appealing to small hoteliers and accommodation providers. Key competitive advantages include Google Connectivity partnership, multi-channel synchronization, and integrated payment gateways. The company maintains active social media channels and provides comprehensive user support and documentation. Partnerships with Stripe and Comgate for payments and Webnode for website integration enhance their ecosystem. Growth potential is supported by continuous feature updates and a clear value proposition for direct booking optimization.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent compliant with GDPR, reflecting a mature privacy approach. However, no explicit security headers (CSP, HSTS, etc.) were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. The use of somewhat outdated jQuery versions may pose minor risks if not regularly updated. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional HTTP security headers and publishing formal security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly update JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest stable versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security audits to maintain compliance and security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Trevlix
Description
Trevlix provides an online accommodation reservation system optimized for hotels and accommodation providers to increase direct bookings, manage reservations, and synchronize occupancy across multiple platforms.
Key services
Online reservation system, Channel manager, Booking engine integration, Online payments, Guestbook and online check-in, Sales and occupancy statistics, Email automation, Discount coupons and vouchers, API for integrations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10, jQuery UI 1.10, FontAwesome 5.12.0, WOW.js animations, Fancybox v3, CookieConsent library
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JS libraries with no obvious vulnerabilities

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Ads Remarketing
Marketing tools
Google Ads, Facebook Pixel (commented out)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms implemented.
  4. Clear business contact information and social media presence.
  5. Use of modern but somewhat dated JavaScript libraries (jQuery 1.10).
  6. No visible security headers in HTML source; potential improvement area.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  8. Payment gateways and channel manager integrations clearly presented.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is business and hospitality focused.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a classic web technology stack centered on jQuery 1.10 and jQuery UI 1.10, FontAwesome icons, WOW.js for animations, and Fancybox for modals. The presence of cookie consent scripts and Google Analytics integration indicates attention to privacy and analytics. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured navigation. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization by updating libraries and improving caching strategies. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with trevlix.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review trevlix.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.