Skip to main content

Security report for treking.cz

Redakce časopisu TREKING · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Treking.cz is a Czech-language online portal dedicated to hiking, trekking, and outdoor activities, offering a wide range of articles, guides, event calendars, and accommodation listings. It serves a niche audience of outdoor enthusiasts primarily in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The website is content-rich, regularly updated, and maintains partnerships with other reputable outdoor and travel websites. Technically, it uses common web technologies including Google Fonts, Adsense, and Tag Manager, with basic mobile optimization and SEO practices in place. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and a consent management platform, but lacks visible security headers and detailed security policies. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the website content and structure indicate a legitimate and professional operation. Overall, the site scores well in content quality and privacy compliance but could improve in security best practices and domain transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching treking.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Treking.cz holds a strong position as a specialized media portal in the outdoor and trekking sector within the Czech and Slovak markets. Its business model revolves around content publishing supported by advertising revenue and partnerships. The site targets outdoor hobbyists, hikers, and nature lovers, providing valuable information and community engagement through forums and event listings. The partnership ecosystem includes several well-known regional outdoor and travel sites, enhancing its market reach. While the site appears professionally managed, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and absence of phone contact details may limit some trust factors. The site’s growth potential lies in expanding digital marketing, improving technical infrastructure, and enhancing security and compliance transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The use of multiple third-party scripts and ad networks introduces potential risk vectors that require ongoing monitoring. No explicit incident response or security policy information is available, indicating a gap in formal security governance. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file further suggests limited public security engagement. Overall, the site is functional and reasonably secure but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency to reduce risk and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and advertising networks to mitigate supply chain risks.
  4. Improve domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is available and accurate.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Redakce časopisu TREKING
Description
Treking (trekking), horská turistika, VHT, outdoorweb. Nejčtenější portál o horách, trekingu a turistice. Články o horské přírodě, vesmíru (astronomii), horolezectví, cykloturistice a cestování i dalších tématech
Key services
Articles and guides on hiking and trekking, Outdoor event calendar, Advertising space, Tourist accommodation listings, Photo galleries, Discussion forums
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, Google Adsense, Google Tag Manager, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://www.treking.cz/)
  • Consent management platform for GDPR compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Marketing tools
Google Adsense
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-established Czech outdoor and trekking portal with rich content.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which limits domain trust verification.
  3. Uses Google services extensively for fonts, ads, and analytics.
  4. Has GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism.
  5. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  6. No contact phone numbers found; only email contact provided.
  7. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML.
  8. Website content is in Czech language and well-structured.
  9. No signs of adult or NSFW content.
  10. Advertising is primarily via Google Adsense.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional HTML structure with CSS and JavaScript, leveraging Google Fonts for typography and Google Adsense for monetization. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS identification. The hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified. The site uses a consent management platform for GDPR compliance, which is a positive technical and legal feature. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve performance metrics, and enhance accessibility compliance to reduce technical debt and improve user engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with treking.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review treking.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.