Skip to main content

Security report for trekbikes.com

Trek Bicycle Corporation · Retail · Finland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Trek Bikes is a well-established global bicycle manufacturer with a strong presence in Finland, offering a wide range of bicycles and cycling accessories. The website targets Finnish consumers with localized content and a comprehensive product catalog. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies such as Vue.js and Tailwind CSS, and is hosted behind Cloudflare CDN with integrated marketing and analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. However, a critical security weakness is the lack of a valid SSL/TLS certificate and HTTPS support, exposing users to potential risks. The site includes comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, indicating good privacy compliance, but lacks visible security policies or incident response information. Overall, the business credibility is high, supported by a mature domain and consistent branding, but the security posture requires urgent improvement to protect user data and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching trekbikes.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention trekbikes.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
6,775
Employees
26
Customers
6,524
Third parties
225
Weak passwords
7%

Latest record dated 2026-06-16 · 40 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for trekbikes.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –projectone.trekbikes.com2026-06-16
  • –backoffice.trekbikes.com2026-06-16
  • –test.trekbikes.com2026-06-16
  • –test.trekbikes.com2026-06-16
  • –rel.trekbikes.com2026-06-16

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates primarily in the retail and transportation sectors, focusing on direct-to-consumer sales and partnerships with retailers. Their business model includes product sales, customization, and cycling travel services through partner sites. The domain age and registrar information confirm a mature and legitimate business. The website's content and navigation are well-structured for the Finnish market, with strong social media engagement and legal compliance. The presence of multiple product categories and support resources indicates a comprehensive service offering. The company leverages advanced marketing tools and analytics to optimize customer engagement.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical vulnerability. While security headers such as X-Frame-Options, Content Security Policy, and XSS protection are present, the lack of encryption undermines these protections. DNSSEC is not enabled, and HSTS is disabled, further reducing security robustness. No public security or incident response policies are found, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. Cookies are set with Secure and HttpOnly flags, which is positive. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS and HTTPS deployment is essential to safeguard user data and maintain trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  3. Implement DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and consider adding a security.txt file.
  6. Regularly audit and update security headers and cookie settings.
  7. Enhance accessibility features and performance monitoring to improve user experience.
  8. Maintain transparency in data collection and retention policies to strengthen privacy compliance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Vue.js for frontend interactivity and Tailwind CSS for styling. It uses SAP Hybris as the e-commerce platform, indicated by static file paths and configuration. Hosting is via Cloudflare CDN, providing performance and security benefits. Google Tag Manager is used extensively for analytics and marketing tracking, alongside Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA attributes. However, performance metrics are not available, and the lack of HTTPS is a significant technical risk. The site uses multiple external resources and social media integrations, indicating a mature digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with trekbikes.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review trekbikes.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.