Skip to main content

Security report for treezor.com

Treezor · Finance · France

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Email security.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Treezor is a European leader in Banking-as-a-Service, providing a comprehensive modular platform that enables fintechs and large businesses to embed financial services seamlessly into their customer journeys. The company offers a wide range of services including core banking, payment issuing and acquiring, SEPA payments, KYC/KYB compliance, and credit solutions. Their market position is strong within Europe, supported by a professional website with rich content, multilingual support, and visible trust indicators such as PCI DSS certification and client success stories. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern tools like WPBakery, jQuery, and Swiper.js, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though some accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and PCI DSS certification, but lacks some security headers and explicit incident response contact information. The WHOIS data is missing, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency, but the professional presentation and business legitimacy mitigate this risk. No blocking or WAF challenges were detected, allowing full content analysis. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with good security and compliance practices, suitable for its fintech audience. Recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing an incident response policy, adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, and improving accessibility to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching treezor.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
80
Email security
83
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Treezor operates in the finance sector as a Banking-as-a-Service provider targeting fintechs, startups, neobanks, and regulated institutions across Europe. Their business model revolves around offering white-label and API-driven banking infrastructure to accelerate client payment projects. The company has a medium-sized workforce and a diverse client base across multiple EU countries. Their partnership ecosystem includes fintech associations and a broad network of clients showcased on the website. Growth indicators include over 7 million cards issued and €107 billion in processed transactions. The company emphasizes compliance and security, positioning itself as a trusted platform in the embedded finance market.

Security posture

The security maturity of Treezor's website is good, with HTTPS enforced and PCI DSS certification prominently displayed, indicating adherence to strong payment security standards. The presence of cookie consent mechanisms and a detailed compliance page suggests GDPR awareness. However, the absence of security headers like Content Security Policy and lack of a published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy are gaps that could be addressed. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture supports business operations but could be enhanced with additional transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish an incident response and security contact page to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards and improve user experience.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from external libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Treezor
Description
Treezor is the European Banking-as-a-Service leader offering a modular one-stop shop solution to embed financial services into client experiences, supporting fintechs and large businesses throughout their payment projects.
Key services
Core banking, Payment issuing solutions, Payment acquiring solutions, SEPA payments, KYC/KYB compliance, Credit services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, jQuery, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, axeptio (cookie consent)
Frameworks
WPML (multilingual CMS)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • PCI DSS certification
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. Strong focus on embedded finance and Banking-as-a-Service.
  3. Comprehensive service offerings and multilingual support.
  4. Good use of structured data and SEO best practices.
  5. Presence of PCI DSS certification indicates strong security compliance.
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via forms and social media.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  8. WHOIS data missing, which is a potential concern but not definitive of illegitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using WPBakery Page Builder, jQuery, and Swiper.js for interactive elements. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and marketing purposes. The site is multilingual, leveraging WPML for language management. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from improved accessibility and security header implementation. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional fintech service website with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with treezor.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review treezor.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.